Re: GPL propaganda

JEDIDIAH wrote:
> On 2008-09-26, Rjack <user@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Andrew Halliwell wrote:
>>> Rjack <user@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> The questions concerning enforceability of the provisions in the GPL
>>>> will occur in the federal courts according to prevailing law. (I do
>>>> not consider non-US jurisdictions.) Arguments concerning
>>>> enforceability should be grounded in references to prevailing
>>>> federal statutes and case law concerning the licensing of
>>>> intellectual property.
>>> Why all the GPL FUD "jack"?
>>> If you don't agree with the GPL, don't try to distribute any software
under
>>> it. 
>>>
>>> simple as that.
>> 1) Never have (distributed).
>>
>> 2) Do care about GPL advocates stealing other people's exclusive 
>> rights with an illegal copyright license.
> 
>      Yet the likes of Oracle and EA seem to manage well enough despite
> of all of your *****ing and moaning. This "problem" of yours only ever
> manifests itself whenever you try to take someone else's property and
> treat it as if it were your own.

You mean like using the illegal GPL?

> 
>      Avoid doing that and all of your ranting becomes completely moot.
> 
>      Use someone else's code in a commercial product and you better be
> prepared to read and understand the fine print. Big news there (not)!
> 

It's none of a GPL licensor's concern how I use someone else's 
commercial product.

Sincerely,
Rjack :)