Rick wrote:
>
> On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 15:19:07 +0200, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
>
> > Tim Smith wrote:
> >>
> >> In article <yIidneUAEomYssHVnZ2dnUVZ_r7inZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >> rjack <robjack@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> > It is most plausible that the defendants simply said to the SFLC,
> >> > "Dismiss or we will file a Rule 12 Motion to Dismiss" and collect
our
> >> > attorney fees and costs. Even an incompetent defense attorney would
> >> > know that the SFLC pleadings are defective on their face due to
lack
> >> > of Copyright Office registration of the allegedly infringed works.
> >> > The lack of a public settlement stipulation by both parties
> >> > reinforces this scenario.
> >>
> >> Yet the source then appeared, which is what SFLC wanted.
> >
> > Verizon offers Busybox object code for downloading on its own web
site.
> >
> > http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp
> >
> > Don't you think that this means Verizon must provide access to the
> > corresponding Busybox source code apart from Actiontec? What happens
if
> > Actiontec goes out of business tomorrow?
> >
> The source should still be available.
And how are you going to enforce that?
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
