On 24 Nov 2007 09:56:04 GMT, MI5Victim@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>MI5 Persecution Update: Friday 13 November, 1998
>
>If You Intend To Reply, Please Read This
>
>If you have any questions or observations you would like to share with
me,
>then you are very welcome to reply to my fax number 0171-681-1190. But
>please.... keep your response to one page if you can! I have had several
>people faxing my article back to me, including one MP faxing back twenty
>pages. I do not know if he had anything intelligent to say in his 20-page
>fax because I applied judicious use of the "Delete" key on my
>computer. Faxes over a page or two will be deleted without being read.
>
>MI5 Resume Hostilities in Response to these Faxes
>
>When I wrote last weeks "MI5 Persecution Update" I remarked how quiet my
>life had become. No longer! MI5 have restarted hostilities with a
>vengeance the past week, in response I believe to the faxes I have been
>sending to members of the House of Commons.
>
>On Saturday 7 November I went to Clapham Picture House cinema to see the
>film "Antz" (a very enjoyable film). At the cinema, I was verbally
>assaulted by a group of teenagers with the words "still crazy", repeated
>about ten times. There was a film with that name showing at the cinema,
>but it was clear their abuse was directed at me. I do not look ill, so
why
>would they pick on me? answer, the incident was set-up by the
>persecutors. One of the teenagers also said to another, "I don't know
what
>we're laughing at".
>
>The following day, Sunday 8/11/98, I was on my way to play squash when I
>was verbally assaulted by a youth who said "it was so funny", without the
>slightest trace of humour. What he meant by this phrase was that was
>funny, and they were trying to humiliate me. I have heard this phrase "it
>was so funny" used at me before many, many times over the last eight and
>half years.
>
>Please Encourage Keith Hill MP to Help Me
>
>I live in a bugged house, bugged both for audio and video. My movements
>are monitored by MI5. The Security Service have followed me to Canada, to
>Poland and the Continent, to the States. I cannot work anywhere, not in
>England, not in Canada, because MI5 will destroy whatever employment I am
>able to obtain. I have asked Keith Hill MP to help me, and he has
refused.
>
>The situation is intolerable. It is Mr Hills job to help me out of this
>mess. So, please, as I said in the last fax a week ago: Do not waste your
>time returning multiple copies of my faxes to my fax mailbox, as some of
>you have done. Instead;
>
>Please encourage Keith Hill M.P. to help me.
>
>I am sorry to be using this device to encourage Mr Hill to help, but I
>think eight and half years are quite enough and it is time something was
>done to bring this matter to a close.
>
>
>MI5 Persecution : BBC Newscasters Spying on my Home
>
>This week's topic is the quite extraordinary claim that BBC newscasters
>such as Martyn Lewis and Michael Buerk have spied on my living room while
>they read the news. I currently have an advert running for the next six
>months in Private Eye's "Eye Say" column (at a cost of over #200) which
>says,"MI5 Persecution - BBC Newscasters Spying on my Home"; the story of
>my campaign in the Eye is on my Website
>at; http://www.pair.com/spook/evidence/plaint/priveye.htm
>
>BBCs staff magazine Ariel also ran my advert "BBC Newsreaders Spying on
my
>home" for one issue in the Personal category on 8/July/1997 before it was
>spotted and axed by editor Robin Reynolds; please see
>webpage; http://www.pair.com/spook/evidence/plaint/ariel.htm
>
>Beginnings
>
>The very first incident in the "MI5/BBC Persecution" occurred in June of
>1990, when a newsreader reacted to what she saw in my living room at home
>as she read the news. My mother had brought an apple for me into the
room,
>whereupon the newsreader smirked and giggled, apparently finding this
>funny. I couldn't believe what I was seeing. I carried on watching news
>and other television programmes to see if presenters would show signs of
>"interactive watching"; to my surprise, this happened again and
>again. Unfortunately, I did not have my wits sufficiently about me to
>videotape these programmes, and it is now almost impossible to obtain
>recordings dating back to 1990.
>
>Most of the "TV watching" has occurred on the news, and most of it in
>summer 1990, although some as late as autumn 1993. My website has a few
>extracts of what might be politicians "getting at" me, in particular John
>Major and interviewer Dimbleby sharing a joke about the "Knutsford
>Guardian" which is almost certainly about me.
>
>I sold my ****table TV in autumn 1990 and stopped watching television
>regularly. I realise now that this may have been a mistake. What I should
>have done was to watch TV and listen to the radio, but tape-record
>everything and make a note of what each excerpt meant to me. I would then
>be in a much stronger position as regards to evidence that I am now. That
>is what I am trying to do now, but unsurprisingly the TV/radio presenters
>have stopped getting at me, now they know they are being recorded.
>
>Examples of Media Harassment
>
>Here are a few examples which I can still remember of media harassment;
>
>In early 1992 I was watching the BBC news with Martyn Lewis on a small
>black-and-white ****table television at my then home in Oxford. I threw a
>term of abuse at Lewis; he flinched, then gave a grin and made a comment
>from which I understood that he had been on my side, but might have
>changed his mind as a result of what Id just said to him.
>
>Victor Lewis Smith in his TV (BBC2?) program at the end of 1993, had a
>taxi-driver saying, "theyre all out to get me", to which VLS replied,
"but
>you're quite intelligent aren't you?" (what a nice chap VLS is,
>compliments no less!)
>
>Paul Daniels the TV magician, sometime in 1990-92 (sorry I can't be more
>precise but it was so long ago), made a "crying face" and put his face in
>his hands, which was his way of expressing that I was frequently crying
in
>1990-92, and that he and other media people found my crying funny.
>
>Kenny Everett (deceased) on some talk show, compared me to a "huge
>ape" who "scratches himself"; he made some other remarks about what the
>"ape" got up to which unfortunately I cant remember. (I remember that
>Everetts comments were quite sympathetic and human, but were obviously
>about me.)
>
>Stephen Fry on another talkshow (Wogan I think) talking about
>"masturbatory fantasies", he then referred to me with the words "you
>prat"; I wonder if the studio audience knew what he was talking about and
>to whom his comments were directed?
>
>Griff Rhys Jones on Clive James' TV show, made a "lunatic face" (wide
>fixed grin) to which I said to the TV that he had a "face like a horse's
>arse", to which Clive James said to GRJ "did you hear that?"
>
>Crimestoppers summer 1990, remarks by a Midlands police officer on the
>programme, while Nick Ross was presenter (as far as I can remember). The
>officer talked about "in car entertainment". Nick Ross said to officer,
>"why don't you stop doing it?" to which he replied, "we can't while he's
>like this".
>
>BBC2 Newsnight in autumn 1993 had a piece on football hooliganism. A
black
>interviewee said apparently of the hooligans, but in fact of me; "they're
>just idiots, carry on with the surveillance".
>
>There was an incident with Jonathan Ross which I remember clearly; he was
>on both BBC and ITV television at the same time, one (ITV I think) was
>recorded, the other channel was live. Ross has a speech impediment which
>causes him to pronounce his "r"s as "w". I sarcastically said something
>about "Mr Woss" to the recorded channel, then turned over to where he was
>live, and he repeated "Woss" with heavy emphasis and sarcasm.
>
>On the radio, in spring 1994, Chris Tarrant made a sarcastic remark in
his
>morning show, saying "he says were trying to kill him, we should be done
>for attempted manslaughter", to which another of the studio staff said,
>"oh no, dont say that". His comment was in reply to a comparison Id made
>the previous evening between my persecutors and the Polish secret police
>who murdered dissidents.
>
>
>Martyn Lewis Denies & Lies, But Wont in Writing
>
>In February 1997 I wrote to BBC Viewer & Listener Correspondence and
asked
>them to investigate the claim that their newscasters had engaged in
>"interactive watching". They replied that they had asked Martyn Lewis and
>Michael Buerk whether they had engaged in such practices, and that they
>had both made verbal denials to VLC, but were refusing to put their
>denials in writing.
>
>I can understand that they might think that if they were to make written
>denials to me, then many other people with my condition might write to
>them with similar questions. But Ive asked a couple of journalists if
>theyve been writing about me, theyve made written denials, Ive believed
>them, and I have not put their denials on my website because, since I
>believe their denials, it would not be relevant to publish them.
>
>To me it looks as if Lewis and Buerk are happy to lie verbally but not in
>writing, because written falsehoods would place them unambiguously in the
>wrong, whereas they can try to talk their way out of verbal lies if they
>are ever caught, or perhaps even deny the verbal lies completely? If they
>lie without shame, then why would they have any shame about future lies
>about lying?
>
>One of the strangest aspects of "TV watching" is that Buerk and Lewis
have
>convinced themselves that their "interactive spying" is reasonable
>behaviour. Martyn Lewis thinks of himself as a "gentleman". He expressed
>in 1992 that he was "on my side". If this matter ever comes out into the
>open, I wonder what these newscasters will have to say for themselves,
and
>what the British public will make of their behaviour?
>
>Media Persecution Evidence on my Website
>
>You may directly access the Evidence section on my website at URL;
>
>The category currently contains four video segments, a number of audio
>files and three published articles. The first video of ITN's John Suchet
>is unfortunately a mistake - after looking at it again it is obviously
not
>about me. The two Ken Clarke excerpts may or may not be about me; it is
>funny that he should keep on harping about "paranoia" and "madness", but
I
>have given these ratings of only 30% certainty, as it is more likely that
>they are not about me in particular, and Clarke is simply displaying the
>normal prejudices against the mentally ill found in much of society.
>
>The piece I find most interesting is the Dimbleby/John Major interview
>from April 1997. I have assigned this a 90% rating. Dimbleby starts by
>emphasising a re****t from the "Knutsford Guardian". Major recognizes
>what's going on and joins in with a falsely apologetic "heaven
>forfend". The emphasis is on the first syllable pronounced "nuts" in
>"Knutsford", which is repeated three times. Of course this is hardly
>anywhere near convincing evidence; the really clear items were all in
>1990-92, and they are basically unobtainable now.
>
>If you're reading the website, have a look at the two files from David
>Hepworth's programme on GLR radio. The first one from 21/Feb/1997 has him
>talking about an "embarassment" of prizes and "absolute obscene", in
>reference I believe to the verbal ***ual abuse that was being used
against
>me at the time (and which unfortunately is still current). In the second
>file dated 9/May/1997 he again talks about "absolute embarrassment" of
>prizes, followed by laughter. To my mind he knows I am listening to his
>programme, and deliberately makes these remarks for my benefit, with very
>little attempt to disguise their purpose.
>
>Bernard Levin - "Fanatic's Fare for the Common Man"
>
>On 21 September 1991 this article by Bernard Levin appeared in The
>Times. It is reproduced in the Evidence section of the website, or may be
>accessed directly at URL;
>
>To my mind, Levin's article described the situation at the time and in
>particular a recent meeting with a friend, during which I for the first
>time admitted to someone other than my GP that I had been subjected to a
>conspiracy of harassment over the previous year and a half.
>
>Levin writes about a "madman running loose about London" who "bursts into
>tears, and swears it is all true. And it is." I am pleased to agree with
>his assertion that "it is all true" because the truth is what I presented
>to my friend in September 1991 and it is what is being presented to the
>reader****p of these articles now.
>
>Conclusion
>
>The harassment, in particular media persecution, was at its strongest in
>1990-92. Today, I am recording everything I watch, read and listen, and
>the media have pretty much given up. It is now incidents "in public"
which
>make up what there is of MI5s persecution. But much of the material from
>1990-92 still exists in archives, although the organisations which have
>those archives generally wont make the material available to the public,
>for copyright and other reasons.
>
>MI5 can no longer employ the media to persecute me, partly because
>journalists now know who is behind the persecution, and also because I
>would publish any instances. My mistake during 1990-92 was to not record
>instances as they happened; Ive learned from that mistake, and know
better
>now.
>
>13259
MI5 are horrible.
|
