On 24 Nov 2007 08:33:01 GMT, MI5Victim@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>MI5 Persecution Update: Friday 15 May, 1998
>
>The persecution has been quite severe for the last week. It appears that
>my enemies are reacting to the steady stream of faxes making their way
>over the Atlantic to the fax machines of Westminster politicians and the
>media. Here is whats happened in the last few days;
>
>The week started off with an incident in the cafeteria at a local
shopping
>centre where I habitually drink my morning coffee. My enemies have
>concentrated since winter 1995/96 on throwing a particularly horrible
>***ual slander against me. They "put people up" to repeat this slander
>against me, and this is what happened again here.
>
>On Thursday morning (yesterday), instead of going to the usual cafeteria
I
>went to a nearby convenience store for coffee. The same horrible ***ual
>slander was shouted at me very loudly by a member of staff as I walked
>into the store. This was the first time I had ever bought morning coffee
>in that shop. The other staff obviously knew what was going on, one of
>them said, "they screwed up my life".
>
>The fax gateway I use to send these faxes to the UK has been working hard
>these last few days to shut down my access by barring the accounts I use
>to send these faxes.
>
>I have received an anonymous threat from fax number 0171-219-6101 (the
>machine gave its name as "ETRA-HoC") which said, "Stop sending to this
fax
>no 0171-219-6101 or else" (the consequences of continued transmission
were
>unspecified). I invited the sender to apologise for his threat, but
>received no response.
>
>
>This all adds up to quite a severe reaction to my faxes of the last few
>weeks. I actually find this quite heartening since it shows that my faxes
>are finding the mark and there may yet be a breakthrough in my efforts to
>expose the Security Service conpiracy of abuse against me which has now
>been going on for eight years.
>
>
>MI5 Persecution: "Why would they be doing this to you, sir?"
>
>This article will concentrate on the difficult question of "Why". The
>question which forms the title of this piece was asked of me by the
police
>officer I spoke to in Easter 1995, when I went to make my complaint.
>
>There are really two sides to this question. Firstly, why should MI5 be
>harassing anybody in this fa****on? Secondly, if they choose to behave in
>this way, why should they have selected me in particular, and not
somebody
>else? Alternatively, why did the persecution start, and why is it
>continuing?
>
>I do not have definite answers to either side of this question, since my
>persecutors have usually kept themselves hidden and only acted through
>other parties. To know "why", one would have to know who the persecutors
>are, and something of their personalities, since their abuse is almost
>certainly symptomatic of a personality disorder of the abusers. Certain
>things however can be deduced about the abusers from the nature of their
>behaviour, and I will talk about this later in the article.
>
>Why did it start?
>
>It is clear that the persecution must have been initiated by someone who
>knew me personally, either at school, or at university, or socially, and
>knew that I was borderline mentally ill, since this is what makes me a
>target for the persecutors. Unfortunately, the originators have never
been
>identified, and there are several possible candidates. Neither has the
>link from the originators of the persecution, to the persecutors
>themselves, ever been made clear. So who are the originators?
>
>University Staff
>
>The identity of the originators may lie in the timing of the
>persecution. It started in June 1990, while I was fini****ng a course at
>Imperial College in London, and a year after I graduated from Cambridge,
>where I received a degree in computer science. At Cambridge I had
achieved
>some notoriety in the computer lab from various nefarious exploits. Roger
>Needham attacked me by saying that "there were great hopes for it, but it
>failed terribly". When I started at Imperial I found that my reputation
>had preceded me; Cambridge computer lab had spoken to I.C. lecturers
about
>me. I.C. lecturer Frank McCabe summed up commenting about "setting up a
>straw man so you can tear him down". (Despite being "torn down" by the
>Cambridge computer labs lecturers, I still achieved a good first degree
>and a Masters degree at Imperial.)
>
>Other students at university
>
>So, the originators may have been university staff who knew me from my
>student days. But there are other possibilities. I had other enemies at
>university, including some fellow students. At my Cambridge college it
was
>common knowledge that my mental health was dubious, and it was known that
>I talked to myself in my sleep - the floor and walls were quite permeable
>to noise, so other students heard. I was given the nickname
>"gibber" because of this habit. Sometime later, I managed to catch myself
>talking in my sleep when I woke up in the middle of the night.
>
>Here is a quote from a participant in the internet newsgroup where I have
>been posting for the last three years;
>
>>One thing which has been missing from this discussion is this simple
>>prognosis: that maybe he is right and that, despite his admitted
>>mental condition, there really is a campaign against him organised by
>>now-influential ex-students of his university.
>
>People I knew socially
>
>I had yet other enemies in 1990 (I am a man of many enemies!). In January
>1990 I broke up with some people I had been going out with socially. One
>of them, by the name of Andy Turner, wrote a letter to Alan Freeman, who
>at the time was a Radio 1 DJ. Freeman read part of the letter out on his
>Rock Show, about the "one who wore out his welcome with random
precision",
>saying "thats a hell of a letter you wrote there Andy", and "with a
>schizophrenic youre never alone".
>
>It is my belief that Andy Turner and his friends were trying to make
>trouble for me, and Turner wrote to Freeman with this in mind. Freeman
may
>have discussed the letter with others, and things may have snowballed
from
>there. This is, of course, pure supposition. The fact is that I do not
>know who the originators are, and can only guess.
>
>Once it started, why is it continuing?
>
>The answer to this question is obvious. It is unacceptable to the "powers
>that be" in the UK to have somebody running around who knows he has been
>targeted by the Security Service and media organizations, and who is in a
>position to embarrass British institutions. This has become particularly
>evident in the last week; as I send more faxes to UK politicians and
>media, so the pressure on me grows, and the volume of abuse increases.
>
>Part of the reason the persecution continues is in the personalities of
>the abusers, and it is this subject to which I will turn to next, since
>the key to understanding the persecution lies in understanding those who
>carry it out, as much as we can.
>
>The Security Service operatives, the persecutors, are they psychopaths?
>
>Let us first examine the definition of the term "psychopath". DSM-IV
>defines "anti-social personality disorder" as a "pattern of disregard for
>and violation of the rights of others ... deceitfulness, irritability and
>aggressiveness ... consistent irresponsibility and lack of remorse". The
>Harvard Mental Health Letter of Sept 1995 describes these people as using
>"charm, manipulation, intimidation and violence to control others and
>satisfy their own needs. Lacking in conscience and in feelings for
others,
>they cold-bloodedly take what they want and do as they please", having
"no
>guilt or regret".
>
>I must say, reading this description of the condition, that it fits the
>persecutors perfectly. The persecutors have never shown the slightest
>remorse or guilt. Even when I was severely ill, they continued to abuse
>me. They have repeatedly blamed their actions on me, which is another
>trait common amongst psychopaths. They have no respect for my legal or
>personal rights, and they use intimidation and verbal violence.
>
>If the MI5 operatives are psychopaths then it would explain both why the
>persecution started, and the degree of verbal violence. Psychopaths by
>definition damage other people; here, the MI5 operatives find an outlet
>for their personality disorder, through "cripple-kicking".
>
>Xenophobia on the basis of mental illness, and race
>
>My enemies have made clear many times that one of the reasons they are
>persecuting me is because of my admitted mental illness. However, it is
my
>belief that they are also persecuting me because I am not of ethnic
>English origin, and the fact that there have been several incidents of an
>overtly racist nature reinforces this view.
>
>In one case, two youths on a tube train in London made openly racist
>references to me as a "soft toy, not up to British Standards". Another
>person near my home made remarks about "Polish people". In yet another
>incident in Croydon, a youth made comments about "foreigners".
>
>But the main thrust of their xenophobia is because of my mental illness.
I
>should make clear that I do not look ill; if you met me, you would not
>know that I had the illness. I take a relatively low dose of medication,
>and feel quite well. But the persecutors have repeatedly harped on about
>my supposed serious mental illness; they have called me a "nutter", a
>"schizophrenic", etc. They have also persuaded other people to use these
>terms of abuse. They are able to get away with this because abusing the
>mentally ill is still something which is mostly acceptable in Britain;
the
>media do it, "nutter" is not taboo in the way that "nigger" is.
>
>Conclusion
>
>There are several groups of people who might have wished to cause me
>trouble, and I still do not know who originated the persecution. Nor do I
>know how the originators came to be in contact with the
>(presumed) Security Service operatives who have been carrying out the
>campaign. To know conclusively why it started, we would have to know who
>started it, and this information is not available.
>
>However, we can infer some things about the personalities of the
>persecutors from their methods, and from the degree of verbal violence
>they employ. It is clear that a main reason for the continuing harassment
>is the psychopathic disorder of the MI5 agents who carry it out. That
they
>have never been "brought to book" for their misdeeds reinforces their
>belief that they do no wrong; and, unhappily, until they are brought to
>book, their persecution campaign looks set to continue.
>
>8909
Very good.
|
