On 24 Nov 2007 07:36:29 GMT, MI5Victim@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>MI5 Persecution: How Could It Be True?
>
>If you have the patience to read these articles you will be struck by how
>apparently fantastic the claims being put forward are. You may ask
>yourself why such seemingly nonsensical assertions are made. This matter
>has been discussed on the Internets UK-local newsgroups for three years
>now, and the denizens of the uk.misc newsgroup (the so-called
>"miscreants") have come up with a number of theories to explain these
>posts; it has been variously suggested that they are a troll (an
>artificial creation for the amusement of its author), that they are made
>by MI5 themselves with the purpose of discrediting other conspiracy
>theories, and that the poster is mentally ill and the articles are
>symptomatic of the illness (the view held by most miscreants).
>
>Are these claims the product of mental illness, or is that just a cover?
>
>The most obvious explanation, that the claims made result from the
>admitted mental illness of the author, is the one which the persecutors
>intend be the one accepted without consideration being given to the
>possibility of the claims being true. The persecutors have actually been
>very clever about this, both in selecting as their target someone who was
>known from school or university as being borderline schizophrenic, and in
>ensuring the nature of their persecution corresponds to what often
>features in the delusions of a schizophrenic.
>
>The very first incident of the persecution occurred in June 1990, when I
>was still a student at university in London. It consisted of a reaction
>(giggling) from the newsreader, Sue Carpenter of ITN, to what she saw
>happening in my living-room at my parents home where I was living. Before
>your imagination gets the better of you I should make clear that what the
>newsreader was reacting to was not too embarrassing in nature; my mother
>had brought an apple for me into the the room, and Sue Carpenter found
>this amusing.
>
>I recognized that Carpenter had reacted to what she had seen in my
>living-room, yet this idea still seemed completely fantastic to me. My
>reaction was to continue watching television, particularly the news, to
>see if this incident would be repeated. It was, many times, both on BBC
>and ITV. An intelligent person would have thought to obtain a video
>recorder and capture some of these incidents in order to try to explain
to
>an observer what he saw in these broadcasts. Unfortunately, I failed this
>test of intelligence, since I did not record these programmes. I have
>recently attempted to obtain from ITN tapes of their news programmes
>dating back to summer 1990, but, unhappily, they have advised me that
they
>do not have complete programmes including newsreaders comments dating
back
>to that period.
>
>From the outset, the persecutors structured their actions to ensure that
>any complaint would be met with disbelief, and dismissed as
>delusional. This is why they chose as their target someone who was known
>at school and university to be borderline mentally ill; and it is why
they
>fired the first shots of their campaign through the broadcast
>media. Schizophrenics commonly believe the media harass them; it would be
>exceptional for "full-duplex television" to exist in reality. Those with
>schizophrenia also commonly believe people are talking about them; again,
>the persecutors have shown themselves very rarely, but act through
>intermediaries, both in the workplace, and in public and during travel.
>
>Mental illness is not the cause of these claims, but the simulation of
its
>symptoms is a cover used by the persecutors to deny their victim the
>ability to have his compaints believed.
>
>What evidence exists to sup****t these claims of "interactive
>television/radio";?
>
>Quite frankly, I have very little evidence to sup****t my claims. You may
>examine the "Evidence" area of my website to see such evidence as I have
>been able to gather. None of it is remotely conclusive. The "smoking
>guns" all date back to 1990/91, and it is really rather late now to start
>trying to look for material dating back seven or eight years. In 1997 I
>started tape-recording every programme I watched or listened to. I also
>started carrying with me a high-fidelity minidisc-recorder with good
>quality microphone to catch incidents of public harassment, but this also
>has not been as successful or conclusive as I had hoped.
>
>Perhaps the best item in the "Evidence" section is the audio file "Life
is
>so hard" (it is labelled with Garfield the cartoon character on the
site),
>which I have given a certainty level of 100%. This item relates to
>harassment at my workplace in Canada in 1996. A co-worker called Mark was
>coming up with phrases and expressions which were repeating things being
>said at my Canadian residence, consequently leading me to believe that my
>apartment and home phone were bugged, and that the persecutors were
>passing their gathered information on to Mark. On one particular evening
I
>said in my apartment, "life is so hard, and then you die". The following
>day I was able to record Mark saying exactly the same phrase at work.
>
>Unfortunately when "they" know you are recording them, they simply dont
>say things which would unambiguously show harassment. When Mark the
>co-worker knew he was being recorded, he only made his remarks out of
>range of the recorder, for example outside the building. When the TV
>newscasters or radio disc jockeys know they are being taped, they limit
>themselves to saying things which are ambiguous, which even in my mind
may
>or may not be personally directed against me.
>
>Who knows about this persecution?
>
>Surprisingly many people know. People in the media, such as BBC and ITN
>newscasters including Martyn Lewis and Michael Buerk, and radio disc
>jockeys such as Chris Tarrant of Capital Radio, know what is going on,
and
>take part in it. Some co-workers at my former workplaces in England and
>Canada have known about the harassment. Quite a few people in the general
>public are also included. I believe the police are aware of the
>persecution, but, unfortunately, have chosen not to take any action to
>stop it. I have complained at my local police station in London several
>years ago, and I have stated on the internet newsgroups that I have done
>so, hence the police will be well aware of my wish to see the matter
>resolved. I believe their inaction denotes a dereliction of duty, but
>without good evidence, I am powerless to compel them to take steps to
>prevent further harassment, or deal with what has already taken place.
>
>What is the purpose of sending these faxes?
>
>These faxes are being sent to three distinct groups of people, namely
>Members of Parliament, the media, and diplomats & legal people. As you
>will have observed I am making use of the email-to-fax gateway at Demon
>Internet to send these faxes. I am forced to use this gateway since I
>currently live in North America, and cannot afford the high cost of
direct
>phone calls to the UK.
>
>My purpose in publicising my claims is firstly to discourage the
>persecutors from continuing their campaign, and also to attempt to bring
>their campaign out into the open, and thus perhaps identify the
>persecutors. Neither aim has been achieved yet, but I hope that with
>sufficient stimulation these aims may yet be accomplished.
>
>The problem with the second aim is that those who read this article will
>fall into two groups, those who dont know anything about the persecution
>and consequently will disbelieve my claims as delusional, and those who
do
>know about the harassment and may have some idea of who is behind it, but
>realise that if the harassers are exposed and the truth brought out into
>the open, then powerful British institutions will substantially lose
>prestige, and be exposed to ridicule.
>
>It would give me hope to believe that these faxes will create a third
>group of people, those who find out that I am telling the truth, and who
>follow their consciences in standing up and seeing justice done. Only
time
>will tell if this hope will be realized.
>
>4559
Sma****ng!
|
