> I'm not sure that's the right question--even if you decide cor****ations
> should not have the status of persons, then the cor****ation is just a
> collection of individuals, who do indisputably have First Amendment
rights.
> So either way, I don't see a case for abridging its (or their, depending
> on your perspective) speech.
An individual can be held responsible for his/her actions. In the case
of cor****ations, there is no individual who can be held repsonsible!
--
Love Everyone Unconditionally
including Yo'self!
