Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Businesses > Accountability Corporate > Re: Cor****ate ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 6 of 10 Topic 11 of 102
Post > Topic >>

Re: Cor****ate welfare (was: Re: Cor****ations Are Not Persons)

by "Josh Dougherty" <jdoc1357b9@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 7, 2003 at 02:50 AM

"Gabrielle Rapagnetta" <{[N0-SPpam]}cut-out@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:lclhgvko5j0pj1jo2pl47ng3pdbpbdnnui@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Constantinople <constantinopoli@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >Gabrielle Rapagnetta
> >
> >>  Constantinople <constantinopoli@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Guilherme <groschke@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> >>>
> >>>> On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Constantinople wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> You want to talk about slaves escaping and slave revolts and free
> >>>>> people helping slaves? That's actually happened. Famous cases were
> >>>>> put down by states. Repeat, by states. Repeat, by states. By
> >>>>> states. Sinking in? Spartacus, John Brown, Nat Turner.
> >>>>
> >>>>      i know states have helped to protect property in the form of
> >>>> slaves.  thats not at debate.
> >>>
> >>>But it is central to the debate. In the real world, people defend
> >>>their own property. The state does not help but rather hinders them.
> >>
> >> Nonsense. I don't defend my own property nor do I have any intention
> >> of doing so.
> >
> >So you don't lock your door and you don't have a gun! What's your
> >address?
>
> There are hundreds of thousands of households in the U.S. that are
> unlocked and unarmed at this very moment.  Why do you suppose they
> aren't being robbed right now?
>
> You propose a world where I need to lock my doors and carry a gun.
> Presently I live in a world where I don't.  Do you see why your
> ideology doesn't appeal to me?

Checkmate.
 




 10 Posts in Topic:
Re: Corporate welfare (was: Re: Corporations Are Not Persons)
Guilherme <groschke@[E  2003-07-06 19:35:48 
Re: Corporate welfare (was: Re: Corporations Are Not Persons)
Constantinople <consta  2003-07-06 23:50:14 
Re: Corporate welfare (was: Re: Corporations Are Not Persons)
Gabrielle Rapagnetta <  2003-07-06 17:39:08 
Re: Corporate welfare (was: Re: Corporations Are Not Persons)
Constantinople <consta  2003-07-07 01:55:09 
Re: Corporate welfare (was: Re: Corporations Are Not Persons)
Gabrielle Rapagnetta <  2003-07-06 19:10:11 
Re: Corporate welfare (was: Re: Corporations Are Not Persons)
"Josh Dougherty"  2003-07-07 02:50:42 
Re: Corporate welfare (was: Re: Corporations Are Not Persons)
Constantinople <consta  2003-07-07 04:02:41 
Re: Corporate welfare (was: Re: Corporations Are Not Persons)
"JD" <JanD60  2003-07-11 20:48:12 
Re: Corporate welfare (was: Re: Corporations Are Not Persons)
Constantinople <consta  2003-07-07 04:08:37 
Re: Corporate welfare (was: Re: Corporations Are Not Persons)
"JD" <JanD60  2003-07-11 20:39:08 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Nov 21 9:55:02 CST 2008.