Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Businesses > Accountability Corporate > Re: Cor****ate ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 4 of 10 Topic 11 of 102
Post > Topic >>

Re: Cor****ate welfare (was: Re: Cor****ations Are Not Persons)

by Constantinople <constantinopoli@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 7, 2003 at 01:55 AM

Gabrielle Rapagnetta <{[N0-SPpam]}cut-out@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in 
news:nuehgv421d51ebh8mev7t2jmpb89cc43kj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

>  Constantinople <constantinopoli@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote: 
> 
>>Guilherme <groschke@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in 
>>
>>> On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Constantinople wrote: 
>>> 
>>>> You want to talk about slaves escaping and slave revolts and free 
>>>> people helping slaves? That's actually happened. Famous cases were 
>>>> put down by states. Repeat, by states. Repeat, by states. By 
>>>> states. Sinking in? Spartacus, John Brown, Nat Turner. 
>>> 
>>>      i know states have helped to protect property in the form of 
>>> slaves.  thats not at debate. 
>>
>>But it is central to the debate. In the real world, people defend 
>>their own property. The state does not help but rather hinders them. 
> 
> Nonsense. I don't defend my own property nor do I have any intention 
> of doing so.  

So you don't lock your door and you don't have a gun! What's your 
address?

> In addition to folks like myself who simply believe that 
> their possessions are not worth the price of violence there are many 
> more who physically or economically cannot defend themselves. 
> 
> That is the real world whether you want to admit it or not.  
> 
>> In contrast, people are unable to maintain slavery privately and need 
>> the 
>>help of the state. 
> 
> Not really.  You're assuming 

I'm not assuming anything. I'm describing historical events.
 




 10 Posts in Topic:
Re: Corporate welfare (was: Re: Corporations Are Not Persons)
Guilherme <groschke@[E  2003-07-06 19:35:48 
Re: Corporate welfare (was: Re: Corporations Are Not Persons)
Constantinople <consta  2003-07-06 23:50:14 
Re: Corporate welfare (was: Re: Corporations Are Not Persons)
Gabrielle Rapagnetta <  2003-07-06 17:39:08 
Re: Corporate welfare (was: Re: Corporations Are Not Persons)
Constantinople <consta  2003-07-07 01:55:09 
Re: Corporate welfare (was: Re: Corporations Are Not Persons)
Gabrielle Rapagnetta <  2003-07-06 19:10:11 
Re: Corporate welfare (was: Re: Corporations Are Not Persons)
"Josh Dougherty"  2003-07-07 02:50:42 
Re: Corporate welfare (was: Re: Corporations Are Not Persons)
Constantinople <consta  2003-07-07 04:02:41 
Re: Corporate welfare (was: Re: Corporations Are Not Persons)
"JD" <JanD60  2003-07-11 20:48:12 
Re: Corporate welfare (was: Re: Corporations Are Not Persons)
Constantinople <consta  2003-07-07 04:08:37 
Re: Corporate welfare (was: Re: Corporations Are Not Persons)
"JD" <JanD60  2003-07-11 20:39:08 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Nov 21 10:21:13 CST 2008.