slinky wrote:
> "Dr Zoidberg" <alexNOOOO!!!!!!@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:g1lsoo$h6m$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> "John Whitworth" <***yjw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:483e6497$0$2486$da0feed9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> Sorry for the slight OT, but the Ebay NGs are riddled with spam, or
just
>>> plain empty.
>>>
>> uk.people.consumers.ebay is just fine.
>>
>>
>>> I just noticed that the feedback score has changed. Mine has jumped by
60
>>> or so, and I've become a 100%-er, rather than a 99.6%-er!
>>>
>>>
>> I've had a dishonest seller neg me in the past 12 months and a clueless
>> buyer left me a neutral.
>> Both of these are classed as bad feedback now so mine has dropped from
>> 99.9% down to below 95%
>>
>>
>>> What do people think of this? Personally, I am pleased, as it's
removed
>>> the slight misjudgement I made as an Ebay noob over 7 years ago! :-)
>>>
>>>
>> I think it's a bloody awful change
>>
>> --
>> Alex
>>
>> "I laugh in the face of danger , then I hide until it goes away"
>>
>
> Why? Because eBay removed your ability to leave a retaliatory neg? Ebay
is
> full of crap sellers who have been abusing the feedback system for
years. I
> can understand why they would resent this change.
>
>
>
Too right
I hate being held hostage - why should buyer leave feedback first?
|
