> The *Proof is in the Pudding*, even if you Google it, what
> university is even keyed into that yet....maybe some???
>
> There was a Naphthalene/Mothball hoax re****tage, which was done
> after the mice/rats were very accustomed to the smell...squelching their
> re****t to rat**** right there....
Naphthalene isn't the active ingredient in moth balls! Did you read
nothing?! The active ingredient in mothballs is:
1,4-dichlorobenzene. Get it through your thick skull.
I gave you re****ts from government agencies in charge of this stuff.
You keep claiming you have evidence when I have shown you 100% proof!
You lie! Let's inspect your lies, shall we?
> Mixing bleach and ammonia in a thick sponge is not going to do
>anything till it reaches you as in stepping on "Sponge" it....
Lies! If you'd taken even high-school chemistry you'd know that
chemical reactions happen with our without a sponge. Once you mix
bleach and ammonia, whether it be on paper, in a sponge, in a jar, on
carpet, in a toilet bowl or wherever, the chemical reaction begins.
What you are stating there is a lie. Gas travels through any
permeable area. It will expand in air. It will penetrate paper. It
will escape an open jar. If people try what you're suggesting you
could be responsible for many injuries and even a death. Scientific
evidence which I have already shown you proves it. If you know so
much, prove it wrong.
> Cigarettes are not that poisonous it's all a Quackery.....per
>Capital..
> It all came from the same guys who invented HIV, Anthrax, Ebola,
and
>all those beneficial diseases like the Tatum Creek Experiment of a
>Streptococcus/Penicillin Strain known as the flesh eating disease/etc...
Now this takes the cake. Again you claim to have inside knowledge.
This "information" smacks of tabloid-front-page-gossip. If you are so
sure of yourself, disprove the Surgeon General of The United States.
Show us the website which confirms your claim. Post one link on here
from a real university to sup****t what you're saying. You quote
studies, you claim university experts back you up, you say there are
hundreds of professional websites, but you have yet to show one.
> The *Proof is in the Pudding*, even if you Google it, what
>university is even keyed into that yet....maybe some???
I Googled it before I wrote it. There are no university studies, no
scientific evidence to sup****t your theory.
In Arkansas, some people believe that rubbing chicken fat on the back
of your neck will cure arthritis, if tem****arily.
Other religions dance with s****s claiming that they are not bitten
because God protects them.
Others believe that aliens are coming and the only way to go "home" is
to drink poison and die so their soul can be intercepted by some
"trans****ter".
Just because you say (type) it we're supposed to believe it? I
brought forth scientific evidence researched, studied and re****ted by
people more intelegent that you and I put together. You cannot defeat
the truth, no matter how many insults you send my way.
Now let's explore your immature behaviour:
> English Grammar/Lit. guy knows how some specific terms but can't
>translate without bablefish tech and triple bridge assistance....
> OT: anyway....let's translate to your forfathers in Chinese and
>rejoice to the year of the Rat or something real smartass like that....
> I suggest you stay in school for the rest of your life in order
that
>you may remain that intelligent and useful forever....tard...
You're just angry here because I exposed you as a fraud... again.
Stop using big words you don't understand trying to sound like an
expert in something you don't understand.
> Boy that's all sure news, must have been written by a
>farmhand........
Someone who knows a lot more about chemistry than you confronts you
with the truth... and you have to insult them.
Conclusion:
You say you know what you're talking about. I rebutted your claim.
You told me I was wrong. I researched it and found the evidence I was
looking for. I copied and pasted it here for all to read. You
insulted me by saying I couldn't explain things simply. You
insinuated I was incapable of normal communication.
You are a fraud. You can provide no evidence from a respected
scientific source to back-up your theories. You are dead wrong and
won't admit it. Stop these charades and admit you are wrong or go
find a conspiracy blog to post to. Here's a suggestion:
alt.conspiracy
Your theories, comments and suggestions, I'm sure, will be most
welcome there. Here, they are not.
|
