On Jun 8, 8:00=A0am, 01dyna <01d...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 00:27:15 -0700 (PDT), mycoolto...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
you
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Jun 7, 8:47=A0am, 01dyna <01d...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 06:46:29 -0400, Shawn Hirn <s...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> you
> >> wrote:
>
> >> <snip>
>
> >> >Sounds like a good reason to sue in small claims court, or at least
> >> >re****t the incident to the NY state attorney general. Good luck.
>
> >> ..or..if the OP had charged it on a credit card, simply contest the
> >> charge.
>
> >Do you think the credit card company will let me contest it when I
> >still have the product in my possession?
>
> absolutely. =A0It has nothing to do with you having the product, it's
> that the product you paid for is not what you received.
>
> I've successfully contested (and won with Amex) at least two or
> three online transactions where the item I ordered was not what was
> described and the vendor either refused to take it back or wanted to
> charge me an exorbitant restocking fee.
>
> In all instances I offered to return the item once I got credited the
> money back but the vendor never responded so I got my money
> back *and* I got to keep the item.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
AMEX seems to be good with that. I used VISA though. Hope they will
be helpful since I never really had anything like this to deal with
before. It's just the thought of my money gone and someone else is
using the product supposed to be in the box is very upsetting. My
mistake was not comparing the cpu that can clearly be seen from inside
the box window with the serial. It's just that the box loked pretty
sealed at the time.
|
