by Jeffrey Turner <jturner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Feb 4, 2007 at 02:08 PM
Bob Kolker wrote:
> * US * wrote:
>
>>
>> You really don't know anything about that, do you.
>
>
> Can you spell contributory negligence? There was a time when one iota of
> contributory negligence was sufficeint to nullify a tort claim.
That's silly. We can't expect people to act perfectly. If anyone,
cor****ation or not, creates a hazard then why should they escape
culpability just because they have a typical spread of imperfect
customers?
> Once we restore sanity to tort claims and eliminate fi****ng in deep
> pockets we can safely remove limitations of liability from business
> firms. We should also end the legal fiction that a cor****ation is a
> person with rights. All companies should either be sole propritor****ps
> or jointly owned by the stockholders with any tort liabilities assigned
> by share of owner****p. The more you own, the more you pay in a liability
> suit. That will go a long way to eliminate externalities.
More libertoonian fantasy.
--Jeff
--
I believe I found the missing link between animal
and civilized man. It is us. -Konrad Lorenz