Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Businesses > Noise - Pollution > Aviation Conspi...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 1058 of 1100
Post > Topic >>

Aviation Conspiracy: "60 Minutes" Does Re****t On Sleep Disturbance!!!

by "Bill Mulcahy" <wmulcahy@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 24, 2008 at 05:45 PM

The graphic (website) version of this newsletter can be accessed at:
http://pages.prodigy.net/rockaway/newsletter473.htm

Aviation Conspiracy Newsletter 
#473........................................................................March

23,  2008 Past newsletters can be accessed at: 
http://pages.prodigy.net/rockaway/ACNewsmenu.htm
 If you want to get the 
newsletter sent to you every week, sign up to AviationWatch. Bill Mulcahy 
rockaway@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 of the Week: "We know that noise from air traffic can be a source of

irritation, but our research shows that it can also be damaging for
people's 
health, which is particularly significant in light of plans to expand 
international air****ts," Dr. Lars Jarup, from the Department of
Epidemiology 
and Public Health at Imperial College London, from a re****t now being used

by U.S. government agencies!!!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
"60 Minutes" Does Re****t On Sleep Disturbance!!!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
As Bill Sees It (Editorial): Do***entary Links Sleep Loss To Major Health 
And Safety Problems!!!  In a major television two-part do***entary CBS did
a 
story (click on picture on the right for part two) on the major health 
impacts that can be caused by sleep loss. While the do***entary carefully 
avoided trans****tation noise (no surprise) as the main culprit in this
sleep 
loss, the fact that the scientists doing the study used noise to disturb
the 
sleep of the test subjects, showed (to me at least) the major role that it

plays in sleep disturbance. If the snoring of another person in the room
is 
enough to escalate blood pressure, how much more damage do 747's flying
over 
all night do? These scientists have the equipment to exactly determine
these 
impacts and this should be part of every environmental *****sment and/or 
impact study done on every air****t expansion plan. It was not done on the 
massive Eastern Region Airspace Redesign Plan which is why this plan
should 
be thrown out and a new one done. Why it hasn't been done is a story in 
itself. I would like to see CBS or any other U.S. news media do a 
do***entary on how in the early 1980's the trans****tation industry 
(airlines and train) lobby pressured congress to remove funding for the 
EPA's Office of Noise Abatement and Control (ONAC). This effectively
stopped 
all federal research into the health impacts of noise pollution.

Our Cor****ate-Controlled Federal Government Changing Their Tune On Health 
Impacts Of Noise Pollution? You can tell something is changing when you
see 
health studies regarding the health effects of noise pollution (done by 
other governments of course) mentioned on government web sites. While the 
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is still avoiding the noise
pollution 
issue like the plague, other government health agencies are starting to
deal 
with it and apparently these other government studies are being accepted
by 
U.S. agencies!!! I did an online search of U.S. government sites and did
see 
see new information the health effects of noise pollution and even a
mention 
of blood pressure increase from aircraft noise!!! Although most of the 
government sites still focused on noise in the workplace and noise-caused 
hearing loss, it is obvious to me that a small revolt is going on within
our 
corrupt, cor****ate-controlled government. I even saw on the phony Federal 
Interagency Committee On Aviation Noise (FICON) web site a "pilot" (yuk
yuk) 
re****t on the "RELATION****P BETWEEN AIRCRAFT NOISE REDUCTION AND CHANGES
IN 
STANDARDIZED TEST SCORES!!!" Another site called "Medline Plus," which
calls 
itself "a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine and the
National 
Institutes of Health, actually had the recent story about the European
Union 
study on the correlation of aviation noise!!! link on its web site. This
may 
seem a small thing that is hidden away in a health "library," but I see it
a 
sign that there is a revolt going on with doctors and scientists working
for 
the government. As we get closer to the end of the reign of the Moron in
the 
Oval Office I am hopeful that the revolt against the aviation industry and

their paid politician stooges will increase.

National Center On Sleep Disorder Carefully Avoids Dealing With CAUSES Of 
Sleep Disturbance!!! While going in to great detail to look scientific,
the 
NIH's National Center of Sleep Disorders Research carefully avoided
dealing 
with the causes of sleep disturbance. This is as close as they got in
their 
2003 re****t: Environmental noise/light: Ambient noise and vibration have 
occasionally been studied as factors improving or impairing sleep quality,

but little is known regarding the extent to which various types of noise
and 
vibration affect sleep. A few experiments have found that light at night
can 
enhance alertness, and that properly timed light exposure can hasten phase

****fts of circadian biology (e.g., ****ft workers). There have been no 
studies, however,  to determine whether turning on room lights at night 
adversely affects sleep quality or quantity. Editor's Note: Apparently
they 
closed up shop after that. No doubt it was thought they were getting too 
close to criticizing the aviation and rail industries.


                       
---------------------------------------------------------------------

                                
@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                                    Im****tant Aviation
News 
Stories This Week

Quiet Rockland Calls for Response from Mica on March 3, 2008 Letter To 
Senators Lautenberg and Menendez 
http://media-newswire.com/release_1062626.html
Quiet Rockland and others concerned with protecting air safety and our 
biosphere are compelled to reply. You are incorrect about virtually all
your 
conclusions. Virtually all your rationales you use to reach them, are in 
error. Why would a Congressman like yourself purposefully disseminate 
misinformation? The answer is clear. You continue to reside in the pocket
of 
the airline industry, John Mica.

(Media-Newswire.com) - Quiet Rockland and others concerned with protecting

air safety and our biosphere are compelled to reply. You are incorrect
about 
virtually all your conclusions. Virtually all your rationales you use to 
reach them, are in error. Why would a Congressman like yourself
purposefully 
disseminate misinformation? The answer is clear. You continue to reside in

the pocket of the airline industry, John Mica.

Your letter's introduction seems to suggest that if "Bobby" Sturgell is
not 
confirmed as FAA Administrator, that will lead to a meltdown in aviation 
safety. Yet we all know that the REAL meltdown has already occurred over
the 
past five years, and you helped. The meltdown was Marion Blakey's and 
 "Bobby" Sturgell's mismanagement of the FAA. Right in your area, Orlando 
International Air****t is experiencing a dangerous shortage of air traffic 
controllers ( ATCs ). The shortage is caused by FAA's seemingly-perpetual 
hostile treatment of its ATCs. But all you can say is "the shortage didn't

pose an immediate threat", even though Orlando International has 45% fewer

controllers than it had 5 years ago. You deceive the public.

Your responses to the Senator's concerns are flawed and incomplete.  Let
me 
respond to some of the further points in your letter:

NY/NJ/PHL Airspace Redesign
 Your letter suggests that this Redesign, for which you have in the recent

past taken to the road and shamelessly pandered as far north as Ridley
Park, 
Pennsylvania, will solve delay problems. You indicate it is in the
national 
interest that Redesign work proceeds. But what we well know, is that the
FAA's 
sup****ting "promises" are specious. This proposed Airspace Redesign was a 
US$50,000,000 boondoggle whose only purpose was to make a few people,
mostly 
contractors, very rich. "Bobby" Sturgell has pushed the Redesign along, 
attempting to rush its implementation ahead of the findings of a GAO audit

and investigation which will indubitably bring the Redesign cra****ng down 
faster than a Southwest Airlines publicity balloon. According to FAA's own

Chief Operating Officer Henry "Hank" Krakowski, the FAA's Redesign is but
a 
"Band-Aid" solution at best. And the real sin here, is that after wasting 
all this United States currency, the Redesign can, according to ATC union 
NATCA, actually make the delays worse. The Redesign would put more planes
in 
the air than the air****ts can handle. Sturgell's FAA in recent years 
deliberately screened ATCs off of the planning of the Redesign, instead 
preferring to pay profiteers for US$50mm worth of useless PowerPoint 
presentations. You see, Mr. Mica, the capacity limitation is on the
ground, 
which is where the Airspace Redesign falls flat on its face. Your letter 
says that "no redesign will satisfy everyone". However, the NY/NJ/PHL 
Redesign will satisfy no one, except maybe the airline-company
profit-takers 
that will be able to pump even more airplanes into the sky per unit time, 
further increasing delays - and except those like you, that feed
downstream 
from their trough. What caused the nation's flight delays was greed 
expressed in the form of over-scheduling of flights and over-saturation of

our skies. It is the bad behavior of the airlines that is really the human

cause of these flight delays - that, and the shortage of controllers at
the 
airlines' and FAA's hand. Keep the airlines from over-booking and 
over-saturating the prime timeslots, and then maybe your will see a 
measurable decrease in delays ( not the exaggerated, if even actual, 3 
minutes that the FAA has "promised" with this Redesign ). And now NATCA
has 
raised serious safety concerns regarding the Airspace Redesign. As one
whose 
house will be flown-over by the Redesign if it occurs, I am not going to
sit 
and listen while you misrepresent the facts about the Redesign to the 
American people.
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Aviation Conspiracy: "60 Minutes" Does Report On Sleep Disturban
"Bill Mulcahy"   2008-03-24 17:45:50 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 11:34:25 CST 2008.