Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Businesses > Noise - Pollution > Aviation Conspi...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 1054 of 1100
Post > Topic >>

Aviation Conspiracy: Noise "Instantly" Boosts Blood Pressure!!!

by "Bill Mulcahy" <wmulcahy@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 24, 2008 at 06:44 PM

The graphic (website) version of this newsletter can be accessed at:
http://pages.prodigy.net/rockaway/newsletter469.htm

Aviation Conspiracy Newsletter 
#469........................................................................February

24,  2007 Past newsletters can be accessed at: 
http://pages.prodigy.net/rockaway/ACNewsmenu.htm
 The PASSUR air****t
flight 
tracking system at many major U.S. air****ts 
http://www.passur.com/sites.htm

(you must have Java installed to view it). If you want to get the
newsletter 
sent to you every week, sign up to AviationWatch. Bill Mulcahy 
rockaway@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 of the Week: "The research team showed that people living for at
least 
five years near a busy air****t and under a flight path have a greater risk

of developing chronic high blood pressure, also known as hypertension,
than 
those who live in quieter areas." from a story this week on the
noise/blood 
pressure link

---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Noise "Instantly" Boosts Blood Pressure!!!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
As Bill Sees It (Editorial): The Media Is Now Ignoring Noise/Blood
Pressure 
Story!!!  One week after they broke the story, there has been almost no 
follow-up stories on what I consider proof that governments (and the
media) 
have been carefully hiding the health impact of aircraft noise on humans. 
According to the recently released British study there is an IMMEDIATE
rise 
in blood pressure in subjects when they are subjected to increased noise, 
even when they are sleeping!!!  This might be old news to the media but it

isn't to me. I think it is should be the basis of all opposition to every 
air****t expansion project. I don't believe that we have had expanding 
aviation for seventy years and nobody ever thought of hooking up a blood 
pressure monitor to someone to test their blood pressure reaction to the 
noise. I believe the aviation cabal (politicians/airline industry/FAA)
have 
done these studies and has deliberately hid them. Or, possibly they have 
suppressed studies that have been done by individuals. Why else would they

gone to the trouble of removing funding (the only such case in EPA
history) 
from the one EPA office that would be responsible for protecting people
from 
noise pollution? I did a quick Google search on "noise blood pressure" and

sure enough, I did find stories (see below) about studies done as far back

as 2002 that showed a link between noise and increased blood pressure 
levels, strokes and heart disease!!! This could be another nail in the 
coffin of the FAA's recent outrageous Northeast Region Airspace Redesign 
Plan as this scheme carefully avoided health impacts of increased noise 
levels on aviation cabal victims.

Communities Must DEMAND That The FAA Use REAL Noise Analysis!!!  It's time

for communities to demand that the FAA stop using their phony computer 
"estimated" Integrated Noise Model (INM) aircraft noise analysis that does

not include other noise sources that impact communities. This can only be 
done if they start using real noise monitors around air****t communities. 
I 
see a lot of politicians getting their faces in the newspapers complaining

about the increased noise their communities are going to get with the FAA 
airspace redesign scheme. However, I haven't seen one mention of the 
increased health impacts that the FAA conveniently left out of their
impact 
analysis. I see stories about communities and politicians fighting the 
Airspace Redesign Plan on the basis that is is unfair or even unsafe. I
have 
yet to see a story saying that a politician or community is saying the
plan 
should be thrown out because it hasn't done an analysis of health impacts.

Why? Where are the investigative re****ters. Have they been told that
airline 
industry advertising is more im****tant than people's health?

 England "To Reduce The Numbers" Of People Impacted By Aircraft Noise By 
Dumping On "Countryside!!!" I almost had to laugh when I saw this story. 
It's clear that the British Government is taking their cues from the 
American FAA. Instead of saying they are going to increase flights and
noise 
impacts on people they use the media to fool the public into thinking they

are going to get less noise. No doubt the "new flight paths" will 
concentrate noise impacts on the politically weak, "countryside" areas and

creating new noise pollution hells, thus reducing the "numbers" of people 
impacted by the noise. This could be an act of desperation as there is 
increasing opposition to air****t expansion and noise pollution in that 
country.

More Studies On Noise And High Pressure Have Been Done!!! Check out 
http://www.oem.msu.edu/news/Hv7n1.pdf
 A 2005 University of Michigan study

http://www.umich.edu/news/index.html?Releases/2005/Nov05/r111805

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Pennsylvania: Rep. Sestak Says Airspace Redesign Plan Is Unsafe!!! 
Essington - U.S. Rep. Joe Sestak (D-Pa.- picture above left) and Don 
Chapman, president of the Philadelphia chapter of the National Air Traffic

Controllers Association, blasted the Federal Aviation Administration's 
airspace redesign for compromising safety. Much of the criticism aimed at 
the FAA for its plan, which began sending significant air traffic from 
Philadelphia International air****t over Delaware County on Dec. 19, has 
centered upon the health and environmental implications of the increase in

noise in the area. But the redesign also impairs the safety of air travel,

the congressman and union representative argued. "This is not just about 
noise," Mr. Sestak said. Worrying them the most is the change in 
navigational procedure pilots leaving Philadelphia International now face.

When airplanes take off, pilots keep with them departure route
descriptions 
which tell them the headings (or directions) in which they must fly. Since

implementation of the new airspace redesign, pilots have received 
instructions after takeoff to fly in a different heading than the one 
published for them to follow. Such in-flight orders could cause confusion,

Mr. Sestak said, exacerbating the frequency of near-accidents on runways 
that are already re****tedly on the rise. Philadelphia International
Air****t 
has seen 12 percent more runway near-accidents in 2007 than in 2006. 
http://www.thebulletin.us/site/news.cfm?newsid=19317268&BRD=2737&PAG=461&dept_id=618959&rfi=6

England: New Flight Path Insanity Proposed For British Air****ts!!!
National 
Air Traffic Control (Nats) has announced plans to reorganise the flight 
paths to the UK's air****ts - potentially shattering the tranquility of
some 
of the country's most picturesque properties. Nats - which manages
Britain's 
airspace - announced today it was launching a 13-week consultation with a 
view to making changes to Britain's overcrowded skies. It is thought those

in London and the Home Counties, which have a combined population of 12.5 
million people, will be particularly hard hit. The plans involve the 
creation of four new holding stacks - which will be used by aircraft 
circling to land - for the air****ts at Luton, Stansted, Gatwick and 
Heathrow. As a result, a large number of formerly idyllic villages may see

the number of flights passing overhead increase. The new stack system is 
likely to affect villages located in Es***, east of Saffron Walden, south 
and west of Bishop's Stortford, along the Blackwater estuary and villages
in 
Hertford****re north of Berkhamsted, north of St Albans and south of Luton.

The changes to the Nats system are designed to alleviate bottlenecks in
the 
present system, which was designed 30 years ago. While only 701,000 
thousands flights used the air****ts in question during 1975, this number
had 
increased to 2.6 million in 2006. According to Nats, some 20,000 fewer 
people will be affected by low flying aircraft as a result of the changes.

However, those in the countryside are likely to see noise increase. 
http://www.aboutproperty.co.uk/news/planning/rural-planning/rural-peace-shattered-by-new-flight-paths-$1206341.htm

Only Noise/Blood Pressure Story This Week!!! LONDON (Reuters) - Living
near 
an air****t isn't just irritating, it is also unhealthy, researchers said
on 
Wednesday, in a study that showed loud noise instantly boosts a sleeping 
person's blood pressure. The louder the noise, the higher a person's blood

pressure went, a finding that suggests people who live near air****ts may 
have a greater risk of health problems, said Lars Jarup, who led the 
European Commission-funded study. "Living near air****ts where you have 
exposure to night time aircraft noise is a major issue," Jarup, an 
environmental health researcher at the University of Glasgow, told
Reuters. 
"The reason we did air****ts is because there was no study that has looked
at 
particular problems of aircraft noise." High blood pressure can lead to 
stroke, heart failure, heart attack and kidney failure. It affects more
than 
a billion adults worldwide. The research team showed that people living
for 
at least five years near a busy air****t and under a flight path have a 
greater risk of developing chronic high blood pressure, also known as 
hypertension, than those who live in quieter areas. That study of nearly 
5,000 people found that an increase in night time airplane noise of 10 
decibels increased the risk of high blood pressure by 14 percent in both
men 
and women. "We know that noise from air traffic can be a source of 
irritation, but our research shows that it can also be damaging for
people's 
health, which is particularly significant in light of plans to expand 
international air****ts," Jarup said. 
http://in.reuters.com/article/health/idINKUA36283020080213

Thailand: Residents cancel plan to disrupt air traffic: Residents affected

by noise at Suvarnabhumi air****t yesterday cancelled plans to disrupt air 
traffic after the Air****ts of Thailand (AoT) agreed to pay them
compensation 
early next week. Disgruntled residents around Suvarnabhumi air****t have 
demanded quick and fair compensation for the impact airplane noise has had

on their lives. They also pressed the AoT to find appropriate measures to 
curb the noise pollution before the air****t opens its third and fourth 
runways. They threatened to disrupt flights, re****tedly by launching 
balloons, fireworks and bongfai home-made rockets. Trans****t Minister
Santi 
Prompat said yesterday the AoT will disburse compensation for repairs to
166 
houses early next week. He promised authorities will decide on any
purchases 
of houses seriously affected by noise after the new AoT board is appointed

in the middle of next month. 
http://www.bangkokpost.com/News/23Feb2008_news14.php



                              
@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                                    Im****tant Aviation
News 
Stories This Week
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Aviation Conspiracy: Noise "Instantly" Boosts Blood Pressure!!!
"Bill Mulcahy"   2008-02-24 18:44:29 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 11:14:34 CST 2008.