Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Businesses > Noise - Pollution > Aviation Conspi...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 1026 of 1100
Post > Topic >>

Aviation Conspiracy: FAA Issues Airspace Redesign "Update!!!"

by "Bill Mulcahy" <rockaway@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 9, 2007 at 03:40 AM

The graphic (website) version of this newsletter can be accessed at:
http://pages.prodigy.net/rockaway/newsletter423.htm

Quote of the Week: "They [noise levels] are not significant, because they 
are in the 45 to 60 noise level," explained FAA spokesman Jim Peters. "The

increase is light to moderate." from a story this week on the FAA 
downplaying impacts from the "update" of their eastern region Airspace 
Redesign scheme

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Aviation Conspiracy Newsletter 
#422.........................................................................April

1,  2007 Past newsletters can be accessed at: 
http://pages.prodigy.net/rockaway/ACNewsmenu.htm
 The PASSUR air****t
flight 
tracking system at many major U.S. air****ts 
http://www.passur.com/sites.htm

(you must have Java installed to view it). If you want to get the
newsletter 
sent to you every week, sign up to AviationWatch. Bill Mulcahy 
rockaway@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Issues Airspace Redesign "Update!!!"

---------------------------------------------------------------------
As Bill Sees It: (Editorial): FAA Issues "Clear" Routing Update And Video
Of 
Airspace Redesign Plan Changes: I was pleased to see that the FAA issued 
their latest  New York/New Jersey/Philadelphia Airspace Redesign "update" 
showing clear aerial pictures and routing maps  and routes of what they 
intend to do (see LaGuardia Air****t aerial picture on the right). I don't 
know what prompted the dramatic change. Perhaps it was my weekly display
of 
some of their outrageous and obscure routing "maps" (see an example below 
left)  in the FAA's original "baffle them with technical nonsense" Draft 
Environmental Impact Statement. Or  maybe it was the Democrats winning
back 
control over congress. Perhaps it was the the EPA, which has some
oversight 
on the process, actually doing their job. Whatever it was, I don't see how

the original plan, with all its obscure maps and purposely hidden impacts,

can still be allowed to be used. This fact, as well as the FAA's 
concentrating , instead of fairly fanning out noise impacts on
communities, 
seems to me to be an ideal basis for lawsuits. Lawsuits are the one thing 
the FAA is afraid of because it exposes their unjust, racist and
politicized 
routing process to outside review.

New Impact Routing Maps Clearly Show FAA Unjust, Politicized And Racist 
Aircraft Routes: One thing I like about the update was how it now clearly 
shows how the FAA criminally concentrates the planned increased noise 
impacts on humans, especially if they are poor and Black and live in 
politically powerless areas. Who has less political power than mostly poor

and Black people in prison? So it stands to reason that Riker's Island 
prison, near LaGuardia Air****t (above right) in New York City, would be a 
prime overflight dumping area.  As you  can see on the map above planes
have 
to make a sharp right turn, avoiding open water, to go over the prison!!!
I 
wonder if the FAA somehow has figured a way to eliminate the Riker's
Island 
prison from their human impact analysis. The FAA concentrates routing 
impacts over their victims to show that they are reducing the number of 
people impacted by aircraft noise. This is how the FAA gets to play one 
community off against other.

JFK Air****t Impacts And *****sments Completely Left Out Of Update!!! 
Carefully kept out of the "update" plan is any mention of what the plan is

for JFK Air****t. Obviously the FAA is going to just going to send the 
projected increased impacts over communities already heavily impacted and 
maintain the politically-protected communities quiet. In my opinion this
is 
due to the influence of Senator "Chuck" Schumer (above right) who I
believe 
uses the FAA to protect certain communities, like Lawrence, Long Island, 
from overflights. As a congressman, Schumer was instrumental in the 
diverting JFK night flights away from Lawrence and over nearby Rockaway,
New 
York City.

 Environmental Problems Developing Even Before "Authority" Takes Over  New

York's Stewart Air****t Lease!!! The infamous ****t Authority, which runs
New 
York City area  air****ts, thought they were going to make a deal with a
few 
local slimeball politicians and secretly build a giant air cargo hub in 
upstate New York without the public doing a thing about it. That may have 
been a miscalculation. Already, a local newspaper re****ts that only months

before the projected takeover, they already have a controversy brewing  in

the form of a small lake located near one of Stewart Air****t's runways.

FAA Issues 60-Page Airspace Redesign "Update!!!" After five years and $50 
million spent on reconfiguring flight paths in and out of major Northeast 
air****ts, the Federal Aviation Administration released a 60-page study 
Friday afternoon on how it hopes to control noise under its new plan. The 
highly technical noise mitigation re****t is available on the FAA Web site:

http://www.courierpostonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070407/NEWS01/704070362/1006

airspace_redesign where readers are encouraged to e-mail their remarks 
direct to the FAA. FAA released the study Friday so interested parties
could 
review it in advance of upcoming meetings in the region on the redesign
and 
its impact on neighborhoods. The FAA has modified the headings of flights 
departing Philadelphia International Air****t over South Jersey based on 
objections from residents and officials, said FAA spokesman Jim Peters.
"We 
dropped one heading that would have sent aircraft over Gloucester and
Salem 
counties. Now, the new track will ****ft over Camden County creating new 
impacts, but they are slight to moderate. Based on our modeling, we see no

significant noise increase," said Peters. 
http://www.courierpostonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070407/NEWS01/704070362/1006



New York: Stewart Air****t Lake Controversy Disturbs ****t Authority's
Waters: 
Stewart Air****t - They saved the lake once before. Now, will the people
who 
love to swim in once-popular Crestview Lake have to ride to its rescue 
again? There will be no swimming in Crestview this year; that much is 
certain. It's closed because of construction of the Drury Lane interchange

with Interstate 84 - in the vicinity of the lake's entrance road. But what

about 2008 and beyond? Diane Newlander, a founder of New Windsor Concerned

Citizens, raised the issue at last week's Stewart Air****t Commission 
meeting. By next year, the ****t Authority of New York and New Jersey is 
expected to be the new leaseholder of the air****t property, and thus would

have a say in who, if anybody, subleases the lake site. But agency
spokesman 
Marc La Vorgna said it's way too early to be asking such questions. Right 
now, the ****t Authority is focused solely on working out the details of
its 
own lease for the air****t property, he said. Editor's Note: Once this 
corrupt, weird "bi-state" agency gets control of Stewart Air****t locals
can 
say goodby not only to their lake, but their quality of life. 
http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070404/NEWS/704040336/-1/NEWS

The European Commission will cap emissions from both domestic and 
international airlines at 2004-2006 levels: As of 2012, all flights into
and 
out of the EU will be covered by the EU's greenhouse gas emissions trading

system, under a proposal laid out by the European Commission (EC) in late 
December. The system is the centerpiece of EU efforts to meet emissions 
reduction targets agreed to under the Kyoto Protocol on climate change. 
Including aviation is necessary, EC officials say, to account for the 
environmental costs of rapidly growing emissions from this sector, which
are 
threatening to wipe out gains made by other sectors. To counter threats of

legal action by the U.S., international carriers will be given an extra
year 
to comply. Air travel currently accounts for only about 3% of total 
greenhouse gas emissions in Europe, but these are expected to more than 
double by 2020 under a business-as-usual scenario. Since 1990, aviation 
emissions have increased 87%. With this measure, EC officials estimate 
annual CO2 savings of 46% or 183 million tons by 2020. The EC will set 
pollution limits based on average aviation emissions in 2004-2006, 
allocating credits to specific airlines. Editor's Note: While Europe at 
least tries to address the aviation pollution CO2  problem President
Moronic 
Polluter and the airlines think of ways of fighting it!!! 
http://www.welcomeurope.com/default.asp?id=1300&idnews=3789

Air Travel Is The "Dirtiest" Form Of Trans****tation!!! These days,
everyone 
seems to be flying everywhere - a function of busier lives, better air 
connections and the proliferation of really cheap tickets. In Europe, air 
passenger traffic has grown more than 5 percent a year for the last two 
years, according to the Association of European Airlines. In Asia, it is 
growing by over 7 percent a year, experts say, and the region is projected

to lead world air traffic by 2025, according to the Association of Asia 
Pacific Airlines. The problem is that air travel is the "dirtiest choice
of 
trans****t" in terms of the emissions that cause global warming, according
to 
Peder Jensen, trans****tation expert at the European Environment Agency in 
Copenhagen. Though exact estimates are complicated, it is four to five
times 
more polluting than a train for the distance traveled, and perhaps twice
as 
polluting as driving, according to Friends of the Earth. Many estimates
are 
higher: flying from London to Paris or Brussels produces 10 times more 
emissions per passenger than taking the train, according to independent 
research commissioned by Eurostar in 2006. 
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/03/28/business/greencol29.php

        @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                    Im****tant Aviation News Stories This 
Week

Crestview Lake's future tied to Stewart Air****t takeover

  Swimmers enjoy Crestview Lake beach in New Windsor. The future of the 
popular recreation spot is up in the air.Times Herald-Record/DOMINICK 
FIORILLE By Michael Randall
Times Herald-Record 
http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070404/NEWS/704040336/-1/NEWS
April 04, 2007 Stewart Air****t - They saved the lake once before.

Now, will the people who love to swim in once-popular Crestview Lake have
to 
ride to its rescue again?

There will be no swimming in Crestview this year; that much is certain.
It's 
closed because of construction of the Drury Lane interchange with
Interstate 
84 - in the vicinity of the lake's entrance road.

But what about 2008 and beyond?

Diane Newlander, a founder of New Windsor Concerned Citizens, raised the 
issue at last week's Stewart Air****t Commission meeting.

By next year, the ****t Authority of New York and New Jersey is expected to

be the new leaseholder of the air****t property, and thus would have a say
in 
who, if anybody, subleases the lake site.

But agency spokesman Marc La Vorgna said it's way too early to be asking 
such questions. Right now, the ****t Authority is focused solely on working

out the details of its own lease for the air****t property, he said.

If ****t Authority is amenable to someone running Crestview Lake, there
then 
arises the question of who would run it.

The Town of New Windsor did that for more than 20 years under a lease with

the state, until rising costs - combined with a growing percentage of
users 
coming from outside the town - prompted it to drop out of the picture in 
2002.

Orange County took over the site in 2003, to much fanfare. It gave the 
county a kind of recreational presence it hadn't previously had in its 
eastern reaches. County officials even talked of putting a golf course on 
adjacent lands.

But by the end of the 2005 season, the county was experiencing some 
stumbling blocks. Because it had only a short-term lease, it couldn't
commit 
funds for needed improvements. The main building was in need of repair,
and 
****table toilets were still being used.

Yesterday, county officials said they couldn't commit to running Crestview

again.

"Down the road, we might take another look at it," said Rich Mayfield, 
County Executive Edward Diana's spokesman.

But he said that running the lake - even just day-to-day operation and 
maintenance - is very labor-intensive, and thus very costly.

"It's not just throwing the gates open and letting someone sit under an 
umbrella," Mayfield said.

And don't look to the town to get back in the business of running
Crestview. 
Before a re****ter could even complete the question, Supervisor George
Green 
had his answer out: "No." He cited the same reason his predecessor, George

Meyers, did for not renewing the lease on Crestview five years ago: too 
expensive.

"If the county wants to get back into it, God bless them," Green said.



FAA will try to reduce noise of planes over residences

Saturday, April 07, 2007 
http://www.nj.com/news/gloucester/local/index.ssf?/base/news-6/1175930704240330.xml&coll=8

By Jonathan Vit jvit@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 proposed noise mitigation plan will reroute new air traffic out of 
Philadelphia closer to the Delaware River in an effort to reduce the
number 
of impacted residents, said Federal Aviation Administration officials on 
Friday.

For the past six years, the FAA has spent $50 million investigating 
proposals to address air traffic congestion in the Philadelphia and New
York 
City metropolitan areas.

In order to cope with increased air traffic noise in communities under jet

liner flight paths, the FAA released a noise mitigation re****t Friday 
detailing possible noise reduction remedies across the five-state area.

In earlier draft plans, "We re****ted that 341,000 people would experience 
some noise impacts," explained Steve Kelley, program manger for the
airspace 
redesign project. "That number of 341,000 was reduced to 67,000. This is 
about an 87 percent reduction to the number of people who are exposed to 
noise levels."

The Gibbstown-section of Greenwich Town****p is in an area that might see
an 
increase in air traffic under the FAA's favored integrated airspace 
alternative.

Under the alternative, Gibbstown residents would see additional traffic 
flying above their homes, resulting in a slight increase in aircraft
noise.

"They [noise levels] are not significant, because they are in the 45 to 60

noise level," explained FAA spokesman Jim Peters. "The increase is light
to 
moderate."

Although FAA re****ts indicate that Gibbstown would see an increase in air 
traffic under the proposed plan, noise mitigation strategies call for the 
flights to hug the Delaware River, reducing the number of impacted 
residents.

"The mitigated headings that we would use are closer to the river and have

less impact than the original plans," Peters said. "We are going to keep 
them as close to the river as possible."
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Aviation Conspiracy: FAA Issues Airspace Redesign "Update!!!"
"Bill Mulcahy"   2007-04-09 03:40:47 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 11:09:26 CST 2008.