Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Businesses > Noise - Pollution > N.Y. Times Does...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 1016 of 1100
Post > Topic >>

N.Y. Times Does Story On Airspace Redesign Scheme!!!

by "Bill Mulcahy" <rockaway@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 11, 2007 at 07:40 PM

The graphic (website) version of this newsletter can be accessed at:
http://pages.prodigy.net/rockaway/newsletter415.htm

Quote of the Week: "We were shocked to learn how much noise increase that 
there would be. I didn't know it would cause high blood pressure or heart 
palpitations and possibly kill people, or make our children stupid." 
Pennsylvania's Delaware County Councilman Jack Whelan quoted in a story
this 
week about community opposition to the FAA's corrupt Airspace Redesign
Plan 
for the Eastern Region

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Aviation Conspiracy Newsletter 
#415.........................................................................February

11,  2007 Past newsletters can be accessed at: 
http://pages.prodigy.net/rockaway/ACNewsmenu.htm
 The PASSUR air****t
flight 
tracking system at many major U.S. air****ts 
http://www.passur.com/sites.htm

(you must have Java installed to view it). If you want to get the
newsletter 
sent to you every week, sign up to AviationWatch. Bill Mulcahy 
rockaway@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Times Does Story On Airspace Redesign Scheme!!!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
As Bill Sees It: (Editorial): Airspace Redesign - FAA's New Victims Make 
Their Own Noise!!! There seems to be a storm brewing over the FAA's
Airspace 
Redesign Plan as communities already hit with aircraft noise find out it's

going to be increased. Even the N.Y. Times, usually one of the aviation 
industry's biggest pollution sup****ters, did a story (2/11/07 - The Roar 
Above: Remapping The Skies) on how people in the N.Y. City metropolitan
area 
are getting upset with the FAA's planned noise increases. Obviously, the 
loss of peace and quiet is starting to effect even some N.Y. Times 
executives. They should give Sen. "Chuck" Schumer a call; he has been very

effective at getting protected status for the politically connected. Of 
course, Chuck Schemer has been one of, if not THE biggest, sup****ter of 
increased aviation over the N.Y. metropolitan area. When this creep was a 
congressman in my heavily aviation noise impacted district, he ****trayed 
himself as a fighter against aviation expansion. Now, as a senator he
boasts 
about expanding aviation in upstate New York's Stewart Air****t.

Even Communities Hours From Air****ts Are Complaining!!! I particularly 
enjoyed the part of the Times story that talked about complaints from 
Woodstock, New York, which is a two hour drive from Manhattan.  It seems 
that the nighttime overflight noise from Newark Air****t jets is disturbing

the yuppies and artists that live there. Maybe the artists noticed that 
there is something wrong with a sky full of long white streaks instead of 
puffy clouds.

 Web Site Shows Pictures Of "Chemtrails" Near Stewart Air****t, New York!!!

While I don't buy into all the conspiracy theories about airplane 
"chemtrails," the fact is that they do contain many toxic gases. While
other 
segments of the modern world industrial nightmare we live in are reducing 
greenhouse gases, the aviation industry is increasing their
contribution!!! 
They are not only increasing the global warming problem, that is
destroying 
the ice caps and causing the sea level to rise, but they are also creating

visual pollution. You don't even have to live near an air****t to see jet 
engine contrails instead of clouds. Maybe some people aren't bothered by 
this, but I consider it just another indication that we have allowed this 
industry to go to far. So maybe the contrail conspiracy theorists aren't 
that far off with their assertions. Strange "Anti-Noise" Group Carefully 
Avoids Mentioning Plane Noise: As I browse the Internet I came across a
very 
weird anti-noise group; founded in the plane noise hell Queens, New York 
City no less. This group has obviously went way out of its way to avoid
the 
issue of aviation noise!!! Now I know that aviation noise is not the only 
source of noise pollution, but for a anti-noise group from Queens to
totally 
avoid it is something I had to look into. I noticed that even in the list
of 
other noise groups they show, the obviously dreaded words...plane noise
were 
not even mentioned. Could this be an Aviation Cabal plot to co-opt the
noise 
issue? It wouldn't surprise me, especially after I saw that N.Y. Mayor 
Bloomberg was mentioned, that the whole purpose of this group is to divert

attention from the airplane noise issue and focus it on things like leaf 
blower noise!!! I remember reading that Russia's Joe Stalin created his
own 
counterrevolutionary group so he could better keep track of those 
counterrevolutionaries who might oppose him. Perhaps Stalin's organization

influenced the aviation industry, and the their politician abettors like 
Mayor Bloomberg. Maybe they created a anti-noise group for the express 
purpose of diverting attention away from aviation noise. What better way
to 
undermine aviation noise pollution efforts then to create a noise group
that 
avoids even recogizing aircraft noise? I wouldn't be surprised if this
group 
gets government grants to pay off the political hacks that probably run
it. 
I liked the NoiseOff  youtube video though. Of course, like every one of 
their web pages I saw,  it didn't have or even mention airplane noise. I 
wonder where this group is located as they don't give their address or
even 
tell who are their officers. That's why I called my web site the aviation 
conspiracy. There IS a conspiracy.



Pennsylvania Community Meets With FAA Criminal Con Men: RIDLEY TOWN****P --
 
U.S. Rep. Joe Sestak, D-7, of Newtown, moderated a public meeting Friday 
night at the town****p's municipal building on the FAA's proposed Airspace 
Redesign plans for Philadelphia International Air****t that drew a 
standing-room-only crowd of about 200 residents concerned about noise and 
air pollution, and safety hazards. Sestak (picture at left) said it was
the 
first time since the redesign was proposed - which would direct flights
over 
major ****tions of the county - that the FAA airspace redesign manager was 
permitted to directly answer questions from concerned citizens in any 
locale. "I think the best we can do is to try to avoid litigation.. and 
consider directing flights down I-95 instead over the heart of the county,

Sestak told the packed audience in the municipal building. He said county 
council has made its position very clear all along. "This mitigation that 
they're talking about - and you use that word very loosely - what they're 
talking about right now, the planes are over the Delaware River until they

hit an altitude of 3,000 feet, then they fan over parts of Delaware
County. 
"Under the current plan they will fan right away, they'll make a right
turn 
immediately." Whelan indicated that FAA manager Steve Kelley said the 
mitigation includes that some paths may be deleted and planes may not fly
at 
certain times. "But the bottom line is they're still going to fly over 
Delaware County - that is unacceptable to Delaware County Council," Whelan

said. Editor's Note: "Avoid litigation!!! Rep. Sestek should be PU****NG 
LITIGATION!!! That's the only thing that the FAA is afraid of. It's good 
that congressmen only have a two year term of office. I hope newly elected

Sestek doesn't get too confortable. 
http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=17835276&BRD=1675&PAG=461&dept_id=18171&rfi=6



New Jersey Politicians To Vote On Dumping Airplane Noise On New York 
Communities!!! TRENTON, N.J. -- New Jersey moved closer on Thursday to 
allowing the ****t Authority of New York and New Jersey to buy Stewart 
International Air****t in Newburgh to help ease congestion in the region's 
skies and air****ts. A Senate trans****tation panel approved changing New 
Jersey law to let the ****t Authority to enter into a $78.5 million,
93-year 
lease of the air****t 60 miles north of New York. It was the first 
legislative approval for the plan, which still requires consent from the 
full Assembly, Senate and Gov. Jon S. Corzine. Bill sponsor Sen. Paul
Sarlo, 
D-Bergen, mentioned the Atlantic City International Air****t and Trenton 
Mercer Air****t as potential purchases by the ****t Authority in New Jersey,

but Shawn K. Laurenti, the ****t Authority's government and community 
relations director, said nothing is imminent. Sarlo said he at least hopes

using Stewart will ease congestion at Bergen County's Teterboro Air****t, 
which has become one of the nation's busiest small airfields. Teterboro 
Air****t has been a longtime sore spot for neighboring residents, who have 
complained of aircraft noise, exhaust odors and incidents involving planes

running off runways. Editor's Note: It is good to see that New Jersey's 
newspapers ADMIT that they are going to dump aircraft noise, exhaust odors

and plane crashes on New Yorkers. Picture on the left is a plane that 
overshot Teterboro Air****t and crashed into a building.

Georgia:   Community Demands  Savannah Air****t To Get "Mandatory"
Routes!!! 
Hilton Head Island Air****t could soon get mandatory flight paths, which 
would stop planes from flying over homes and could eliminate the noise and

safety complaints that have hounded the air****t in recent years. At
meeting 
with county and town representatives today, state and federal aviation 
officials said they will begin drafting mandatory flight paths that would 
require planes to fly over the water or other inhabited areas. The air****t

currently has only voluntary flight paths that carry no penalties for
pilots 
who don't follow them. Some residents have complained that pilots ignore 
those routes and take shortcuts over land, often buzzing loudly over
homes. 
http://www.islandpacket.com/front/story/6358154p-5674053c.html

Illinois: Dueling Plans For Proposed Peotone Air****t: The Illinois 
Department of Trans****tation on Friday submitted two layouts for the 
proposed air****t near Peotone to the Federal Aviation Administration, 
initiating what is likely to be a lengthy review that will prove crucial
to 
whether the project moves forward. The layouts for an inaugural airstrip, 
one designed by IDOT and the other by a commission created by U.S. Rep. 
Jesse Jackson Jr. (D-Ill.) that wants to oversee construction, will be 
reviewed by the FAA to determine which would work best, said IDOT
spokesman 
Mike Claffey. "It's in the hands of the FAA, and we're hoping to hear
which 
one is finally determined to be the most suitable," Claffey said. IDOT did

not specify which it prefers, something the FAA hopes to iron out with the

state next week to ensure a manageable review, said FAA Chicago regional 
spokesman Tony Molinaro. Typically, the FAA receives one preferred layout 
for an air****t, he noted. "The FAA is ready to work with the state on its 
planning process to resolve this issue," Molinaro said. 
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/northshore/chi-0702100138feb10,1,5171604.story?coll=chi-newslocalnorthshore-hed

                              
@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Aviation News Stories This Week

HERE come the planes.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/11/nyregion/nyregionspecial2/11Rcover.html?_r=2&pagewanted=1&oref=slogin



Look Up Noise Levels by Neighborhood (faa.gov)

Multimedia

Graphic

Altering the Airspace

Related

In Connecticut, Quieter Planes but Still Many of Them (February 11, 2007)

On Long Island, Noise Concerns Grow Near Smaller Air****ts (February 11, 
2007)

In New Jersey, a Politician Fields Noise Complaints (February 11, 2007)

In Westchester County, a Noise Watchdog Weighs In (February 11, 2007)

In the Region

Long Island, Westchester, Connecticut and New Jersey Go to Complete 
Coverage » Enlarge This Image George Ruhe for The New York Times THE VIEW 
BELOW An air traffic controller, Scott Brancifort, working in the control 
tower at Bradley International Air****t in Windsor Locks.

Nearly everywhere you look in the Northeast, there are signs of increasing

air traffic. Even in remote rural areas, 100 miles from a major New York 
air****t, the thunder of jets routinely fills the air.

In Woodstock, N.Y., more than two hours' drive from one of the three major

air****ts in the New York City area, a jet p***** overhead every two to
five 
minutes, residents say, since 1997, when the area became part of a landing

approach to Newark Liberty International Air****t. To the residents, many
of 
whom moved to the Catskills to escape pollution and the urban hullabaloo, 
the constant noise is especially irksome.

"It's like having a highway over my head," said Euphrosyne Bloom, a poet
and 
filmmaker who lives in West Saugerties, N.Y., near Woodstock. "They are
loud 
enough to wake you up in the middle of the night."

At 10,000 to 20,000 feet, airliners seem small, but even the newer, more 
efficient jets can be loud. Like sparrows towing a freight train, they 
rumble across the sky, leaving feathery white contrails, ribbons of
exhaust 
that slowly disperse and form their own pseudo-cirrus clouds. In the
minute 
or so it takes for a jet to pass overhead, the sound gets louder, until 
finally it fades away, a thunder without rain.

Now, for many residents across the region, from Bergen County in New
Jersey 
to Litchfield County in Connecticut, noise levels from aircraft could
change 
significantly under a major reorganization of the highways in the sky that

the Federal Aviation Administration is undertaking for the first time
since 
the 1960s. It is called the New York/New Jersey/Philadelphia Metropolitan 
Area Airspace Redesign Project.

After nine years of study, planning and public hearings, the F.A.A. is 
expected to make a decision this spring on how planes will be routed from 
the 5 major air****ts and 16 satellite air****ts within a 31,000-square-mile

area that stretches from Delaware to Connecticut. The F.A.A. says it is
part 
of an effort to address airplane delays in the nation's busiest airspace
and 
to minimize conflicts among planes in flight so controllers will not have
to 
issue so many instructions. The proposed changes - combined with the
steady 
increase in air traffic at satellite air****ts like Stewart International
in 
New Windsor, N.Y., near Newburgh, Trenton-Mercer County in West Trenton, 
N.J., and Westchester County Air****t in White Plains - have led to the 
creation of community organizations concerned about noise.

But many of these groups and elected officials say the F.A.A. is not 
adequately addressing concerns about noise levels on the ground. 
Representative Steve Rothman, a New Jersey Democrat, says the F.A.A.'s 
redesign plan does not include any meaningful provisions to reduce the 
impact of noise on people living below flight paths. "I am aware that our 
traffic patterns should be redesigned to reduce flight delays and allow
more 
flights in and out of some of the busier air****ts," he said. "I don't 
believe F.A.A. officials have tried hard enough to do that."

There are now four alternatives, and depending on the choice by the
F.A.A., 
some people will hear more noise. Others will hear slightly less. Over
all, 
those already noisy areas will stay the same. For example, New Jersey 
residents in the western edge of Warren County and in part of Somerset 
County could find a moderate reduction in noise levels, according to an 
F.A.A. projection of decibel levels. But residents in Bergen, Rockland and

Orange Counties could experience a significant increase in air traffic 
noise.

Noise levels could also rise in and around Stamford and Danbury in 
Connecticut as well as nearly a dozen towns in Westchester, including 
Briarcliff Manor and Peekskill, because of changes at La Guardia Air****t. 
Already, air traffic from the Westchester air****t has prompted town 
officials in Greenwich to demand a mandatory ban on departures and
landings 
from midnight to 6:30 a.m. after a voluntary restriction on overnight 
flights failed.

The four plans under consideration include modifying existing air space, 
routing air traffic over the ocean, making additional airspace available
for 
air traffic controllers, or taking no action at all. Given the increased 
volume of air traffic nationwide - 739 million passengers last year, with 
the number expected to climb to 1 billion passengers in 2015 - the overall

situation in the air is only going to get worse; not just in suburbs close

to New York City but for miles, far beyond the city's borders.

In Connecticut, in northern Litchfield County, jets taking off from
Bradley 
International Air****t in Windsor Locks, north of Hartford, cut across the 
countryside with increasing regularity. "It can get pretty loud," said 
Roberta Memoli, a bank employee who has lived on Fuller Mountain, just 
outside Kent, for 17 years. "There are times when it's like a traffic
jam."

Some 75 to 100 jets going to and from Bradley Air****t fly over the area 
daily, according to F.A.A. officials, although local residents claim there

are more. This number does not take into account additional overflights 
originating in Boston or Europe, which turn onto the same route, Victor
405, 
a kind of highway in the sky that connects the Bradley Air****t area with
the 
next ground-based navigational aid in Pawling, N.Y.

HIGHWAYS in the sky are somewhat analogous to highways on the ground, with

large main routes that branch off into minor roadways. This is what the 
F.A.A. is rewriting. In the Northeast, a sectional aeronautical chart, or 
road map of the sky, looks almost as webbed and complex as road maps of
the 
ground.

Each spur of the highway below 18,000 feet is known as a "victor airway." 
Above 18,000 feet, they are called "jet routes." The Catskill Mountains 
approach pattern that prompted citizen consternation is known as Victor
213. 
The takeoff pattern, Victor 405, which cuts through the Litchfield Hills, 
was changed in 1997 as part of a reshuffling of the Boston airspace, to 
accommodate many more planes.

"Aircraft flights are forecast to grow," said Steven Kelley, the project 
manager of the F.A.A.'s airspace redesign project. "So there will be 
additional noise impacts."

Unlike roadways on the ground, the virtual highways in the sky are three 
dimensional. This vastly complicates the job of the controllers and air 
traffic planners. For wherever you have heavy traffic, in and out, both 
horizontal and vertical separation of the traffic flows must be provided 
for. To airspace designers, controllers and the F.A.A., the paramount
issue 
is separation - that is, keeping airplanes separate from one another in
the 
air. This is their operational imperative, their higher calling.

After separation, the goal of air traffic professionals is efficiency, or 
the need to minimize delays, which any frequent flier can attest are
endemic 
to the system.

It is therefore not surprising that the F.A.A. does not consider ground 
noise the first priority in its planning. Mr. Kelley said that the 
government's current efforts are focused on two goals: safety and 
efficiency. If some noise mitigation were to result from the redesign of
the 
airspace, that would be all to the good - but it would be, at best, a side

issue.

Mark Allan Guiod, the air traffic manager at Bradley Air****t, said that 
annoyance levels on the ground are generally not part of his team's
mission. 
"When we are dealing with traffic flows, we are not looking at what's 
underneath them," he said in his office at the Bradley control tower. "If 
you don't like the noise now, think of the noise when two planes hit each 
other."

Some opponents of aircraft noise have suggested rotating the traffic on 
victor airways, so that long-suffering areas can enjoy respites. They also

propose rerouting planes along "trans****tation corridors," places where
the 
pattern of development has led to pre-existing noise levels that would
mask 
aircraft sounds and not detract from the quality of life. They offer as an

example the New York Thruway, with its booming truck traffic.

But such suggestions present their own problems, air traffic professionals

contend, and do not come to terms with the three-dimensional structure of 
the system - and the cascading effects of delays at any one point along
the 
line.

In New Jersey, community opposition to Newark Liberty International
Air****t 
operations has long been organized. The New Jersey Coalition Against 
Aircraft Noise has proposed that departing Newark westbound airplanes
first 
wheel out over Raritan Bay, then turn around after gaining altitude to 
proceed across land. Early in the process, however, the F.A.A. has 
discounted this "ocean routing" option in its planning, saying it would
not 
eliminate delays. Newark air****t consistently leads the nation in delays.

From the standpoint of the airline industry and the F.A.A., it is much 
easier to make changes in the cockpit than in air routes. One answer to 
growing airplane noise may be technological: getting planes higher faster.

Also, newer aircraft are less noisy.

In the Woodstock area, residents formed a group called Ulsterites Fight 
Overflight Noise and campaigned for more than a decade to get the F.A.A.
to 
alter Victor 213. At first, Joyce Timpanelli, 70,a retired English
professor 
who lives in Woodstock, said she felt she was getting the runaround from
the 
F.A.A. But eventually the group achieved a 30 percent to 40 percent 
reduction in airline overflights.

"We held meetings," she said. "My husband and I kept a log, with a 
stopwatch, tracking flights overhead. I gave something like 10 years of my

life to this. It is still terrible."

For the airspace redesign project, the F.A.A. will hold additional public 
hearings in the spring that focus on noise concerns, according to Jim 
Peters, a spokesman for the agency. In August, he said, the agency will 
issue its decision.







Email From Arline Brozaft, Aviation Activist

: I am a member of Congressman Sestak's (picture left) advisory committee 
and served
on the panel in Philadelphia this past Friday. There were about 200 
residents
in attendance who came to speak out against proposed FAA Airspace Redesign
-
they were protesting the resulting increase in noise over their homes if
Redesign went into effect and were also concerned about safety and air 
pollution.
Mr. Steve Kelley of the FAA made a presentation and then answered the 
questions
raised by the audience. These questions, relevant and on target, were
asked
in a polite manner and Mr. Kelley answered all of them politely but not
necessarily to the satisfaction of the audience. Congressman Sestak
stressed 
that
he would like to work out something with the FAA to address the concerns
of 
his
constituents and promised the audience that he and his advisory committee
would continue to talk to Mr. Kelley and other interested parties. 
Congressman
Sestak is also aware that the Proposed Airspace Redesign, if adopted, will
adversely affect residents in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut and 
Delaware. He
and his advisory committee also commented on the need for this country to
develop an overall trans****tation policy, not policies that separately 
address
air, rail and highway issues. Arline L. Bronzaft
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
N.Y. Times Does Story On Airspace Redesign Scheme!!!
"Bill Mulcahy"   2007-02-11 19:40:44 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 11:40:56 CST 2008.