In article <1159463527.469525.245250@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
NYC XYZ <jack_foreigner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>But how about folks who videotape cop violence?? Why should the law be
>different WRT audio and video?
If you don't think it should be, write to your representatives and
suggest they change it.
Meanwhile, it _is_.
>Seems to me like if it's public, it's all the same!
The law isn't based on "seems to you like", it's based on the written
statutes.
> If I'd videotaped them drinking and
>having BBQs in the alley where trash is stored (which sounds like a
>fire safety code violation, damned spic caca-rachas!), would I have
>been "criminally eavesdropping" on them???
Videotaping isn't eavesdropping.
Seth
|
