Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Businesses > Noise Pollution Controls > Aviation Conspi...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 362 of 405
Post > Topic >>

Aviation Conspiracy: Connecticut To Get "Creamed" By Airspace Redesign Change?

by "Free Speaker" <rockaway@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aug 8, 2006 at 01:42 PM

The graphic (website) version of this newsletter can be accessed at:
http://pages.prodigy.net/rockaway/newsletter388.htm

Quote of the Week: "You're going to get creamed by it" Robert Belzer, The 
New Jersey Coalition Against Aircraft Noise on how  the new Airspace 
Redesign Plan will affect Fairfield, Connecticut

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Aviation Conspiracy Newsletter 
#388..................................................................................August

6,  2006 Past newsletters can be accessed at: 
http://pages.prodigy.net/rockaway/ACNewsmenu.htm
 The PASSUR air****t
flight 
tracking system at many major U.S. air****ts 
http://www.passur.com/sites.htm

(you must have Java installed to view it) Bill Mulcahy
rockaway@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To Get "Creamed" By Airspace Redesign Change?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Aviation Conspiracy Newsletter Mailing List: I've received a few emails
from 
people who have asked to be put on the Aviation Conspiracy Mailing List. 
Unfortunately I've found it too much trouble to keep it up especially when

companies (get rid of AOL if you use them) like AOL disallow bulk mailing
to 
their subscribers. So if you want to see the newsletter you should save
the 
index site in your "favorites" or sign up to the AviationWatch web site.

As Bill Sees It: (Editorial)  Communities Starting To Realize The Impacts
Of 
Airspace Redesign Plan!!! Connecticut communities are starting to realize 
that the new flight proposed pattern in the FAA Eastern Region's highly 
deceptive Airspace Redesign Plan is going to increase their noise assault 
from planes using New York City's LaGuardia Air****t. Even though the FAA 
deliberately minimized and hid the impacts, communities should have been 
complaining about this long before the comment period ended a month ago. 
Still, it is never too late to stop this plan as politics play a major
role 
in everything the FAA does. I was surprised to see that there were "1700 
groups and individuals" who commented on the draft environmental impact 
study (DEIS). I thought that the public wasn't paying attention. I can 
hardly wait to get my copy of the "Final" EIS which is supposed to have
the 
comments published in it and well as response to each objection. I wonder 
how the FAA will avoid doing this. I will try to find out the date for the

final EIS release and how the FAA will respond to the massive numbers of 
objections to it.

Connecticut Community Upset Over New Airspace Redesign Plan Impacts: 
STAMFORD, Conn. --A new flight path for airlines heading to New York could

pass over southwestern Connecticut, setting off a commotion on the ground 
almost as noisy as jet engines in the air. Approaching aircraft would
begin 
their descent over Fairfield County and hew closely to the coastline near 
Stamford and Greenwich before crossing over Long Island Sound to land at
La 
Guardia Air****t. The path is one of five being considered by the Federal 
Aviation Administration. The New Jersey Coalition Against Aircraft Noise, 
which is alerting Fairfield County about the potential ****ft of the
approach 
pattern to La Guardia offers a blunt message to the region: "You're going
to 
get creamed by it," said Robert Belzer, the group's president. A noise
level 
increase of 1.5 decibels is considered significant enough to be noticed,
the 
agency said. Belzer said the FAA has downplayed the potential effects,
using 
newer and quieter aircraft models to calculate noise levels. The FAA also 
has not provided information about the altitudes of planes associated with

the proposed flight paths, he said. "There's no question that they're 
understating the impacts of this," Belzer said. "I think Fairfield County 
needs to look at this." The New Jersey air****t-monitoring coalition was
one 
of about 1,700 groups and individuals to comment on the FAA proposal
during 
a public comment period. 
http://www.boston.com/news/local/connecticut/articles/2006/08/05/possible_airline_flight_path_change_concerns_southwestern_conn/

Chicago: O'Hare Air****t Expansion Opponents Lose A Round: The City of 
Chicago cleared another legal hurdle Friday in its attempts to demolish a 
Bensenville cemetery that stands in the way of the planned O'Hare Air****t 
expansion project. A federal appeals court in Wa****ngton, D.C., dismissed
a 
lawsuit filed by attorneys for two suburban villages and the owners of St.

Johannes Cemetery, which lies in the path of one of four new runways at 
O'Hare. St. John's United Church of Christ, along with officials from 
Bensenville and Elk Grove Village, contend that the Federal Aviation 
Administration should never have approved the air****t expansion plan
because 
razing the cemetery would be a violation of a federal law protecting 
religious freedom. Expansion opponents, meanwhile, said they were 
disappointed by the D.C. court's ruling, but not discouraged. "This is a 
15-round champion****p fight. We lost round 13 . . . but the fight's not 
over," Elk Grove Village Mayor Craig Johnson said. 
http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-hare05.html
 Twenty-Fifth 
Anniversary Of Air Traffic Controller Strike: When 13,000 air traffic 
controllers failed to re****t for work 25 years ago today, they were going 
for broke in a high-stakes poker game. They thought they had a good hand: 
Without their skills, American aviation would be virtually grounded. They 
thought they knew their White House opponent: As a candidate the previous 
October, Ronald Reagan had pledged his sup****t for their cause. They were 
wrong on both counts. The outcome of the strike that began at 7 a.m. on 
August 3, 1981, was to haunt organized labor for a generation. The federal

government had assumed responsibility for guiding commercial planes into
and 
out of the nation's air****ts back in 1936. The Federal Aviation 
Administration, which came to oversee this service, had a reputation for 
autocratic management, poor communication, and unwise cost cutting. As air

traffic increased, the duties of the controllers became increasingly 
stressful. Often relying on antiquated equipment, they continuously
juggled 
flights, anticipated trajectories, and reacted to ever-****fting 
contingencies, all with the knowledge that a mistake might mean
catastrophe. 
http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/web/20060803-air-traffic-controllers-strike-reagan-federal-aviation-administration-faa-civil-service-labor-movement-poli-unions-patco.shtml



                      @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Aviation News Stories This Week

Possible airline flight path change concerns southwestern Conn.

August 5, 2006 
http://www.boston.com/news/local/connecticut/articles/2006/08/05/possible_airline_flight_path_change_concerns_southwestern_conn/

STAMFORD, Conn. --A new flight path for airlines heading to New York could

pass over southwestern Connecticut, setting off a commotion on the ground 
almost as noisy as jet engines in the air.

Approaching aircraft would begin their descent over Fairfield County and
hew 
closely to the coastline near Stamford and Greenwich before crossing over 
Long Island Sound to land at La Guardia Air****t. The path is one of five 
being considered by the Federal Aviation Administration.

The New Jersey Coalition Against Aircraft Noise, which is alerting
Fairfield 
County about the potential ****ft of the approach pattern to La Guardia 
offers a blunt message to the region: "You're going to get creamed by it,"

said Robert Belzer, the group's president.

The FAA has said flight path changes may be needed to reduce delays at La 
Guardia; John F. Kennedy Air****t in New York; Newark Liberty Air****t in 
Newark, N.J.; and air****ts in Philadelphia.

Aviation officials say a change would not significantly increase noise
over 
Fairfield County.

FAA spokeswoman Arlene Murray said the agency will not discuss the effects

of various proposals until it reviews public comments and studies each
plan.

Other proposals being considered by the agency, which hopes to choose an 
alternative by the end of the year, include a route over the Atlantic
Ocean 
and leaving flight paths unchanged.

"Each alternative has various impacts in different areas," Murray said.
"We 
have not chosen an alternative yet."

Greenwich and Stamford are among several communities in the area that have

voiced reservations about the possible changes.

Stamford Mayor Dannel Malloy said city officials will "get more heavily 
involved" with the issue.

Greenwich has directed a town task force that handles issues related to 
nearby Westchester County Air****t in New York to review the La Guardia 
approach. The town also raised questions about the proposal in a letter to

the FAA.

Projected decibel levels in the area would range from about the mid-30s to

the low 40s, according to the FAA and re****ted Saturday by The Advocate of

Stamford. Thirty decibels is about equal to a soft whisper from five feet 
away, while 50 decibels is comparable to light traffic from 100 feet away,

according to the agency.

A noise level increase of 1.5 decibels is considered significant enough to

be noticed, the agency said.

Belzer said the FAA has downplayed the potential effects, using newer and 
quieter aircraft models to calculate noise levels. The FAA also has not 
provided information about the altitudes of planes associated with the 
proposed flight paths, he said.

"There's no question that they're understating the impacts of this,"
Belzer 
said. "I think Fairfield County needs to look at this."

The New Jersey air****t-monitoring coalition was one of about 1,700 groups 
and individuals to comment on the FAA proposal during a public comment 
period.

Any changes are not expected to take effect until 2011 and must be
approved 
by Congress.

------
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Aviation Conspiracy: Connecticut To Get "Creamed" By Airspace Re
"Free Speaker"   2006-08-08 13:42:11 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Nov 21 1:54:55 CST 2008.