Talk About Network

Google





Businesses > Death-penalty > Re: Deregulator...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 8 Topic 18599 of 19095
Post > Topic >>

Re: Deregulator Looks Back, Unswayed

by asclero@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Nov 17, 2008 at 01:29 PM

"John Rennie" <john-rennie@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:T4OdneWTiu_hKbzUnZ2dnUVZ8qbinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/17/business/economy/17gramm.html?hp
>
> "A fierce opponent of government intervention in the marketplace, Mr.
> Gramm, a Republican from Texas, recalled the episode during a 2001
Senate
> debate over a measure to curb predatory lending. What some view as
> exploitive, he argued, others see as a gift.
>
> "Some people look at subprime lending and see evil. I look at subprime
> lending and I see the American dream in action," he said. "My mother
lived
> it as a result of a finance company making a mortgage loan that a bank
> would not make.""
>
> More fool the bank she went to if she did in fact ask for and was
rejected
> for a bank mortgage.  In no way was Mrs Gramm a sub prime borrower.  
She
> was a nurse, always a valued profession.    She had three children and a
> disabled husband - some might consider that only to be a financial
> burden - to a lender it should mean that she was tied down firmly to her
> home.   The above really proves that Mr. Gramm has no idea about
sub-prime
> mortgages - he's got qualifications but they are merely academic - he's
> never done any lending.      What he fails to understand about the world
> of banking from roundabout 2000 onwards is that it had no relation to
the
> world that he studied long ago at university.   Financial institutions
> lent to customers money that they borrowed from other institutions. 
That
> means that they immediately lost any connection or interest in the
person
> they lent money to.   It became somebody else's problem. That's just not
> proper lending - the only regulation that the mortgage and banking
> industry requires is, to put it very simply, that you may only lend your
> own institution's money. That requirement means that banks will self
> regulate themselves which is what Mr. Gramm wanted but not quite in the
way
> he wanted.
>
Gramm holding forth on why the economy's dive is a media-induced
hallucination and so everybody should stop "whining" about it:

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/10/mccain.gramm/index.html#cnnSTCVideo

Born too late, Gramm.  Herbert Hoover could have gotten away with
peddling crap like that but nobody buys it anymore--not even McCain.

http://www.truveo.com/Obama-responds-to-Mccain-adviser-Phil-Gramm-whiner/id/1495038217
 




 8 Posts in Topic:
Deregulator Looks Back, Unswayed
"John Rennie" &  2008-11-17 18:14:22 
Re: Deregulator Looks Back, Unswayed
Donna Evleth <devleth@  2008-11-17 19:50:42 
Re: Deregulator Looks Back, Unswayed
"John Rennie" &  2008-11-17 21:32:01 
Re: Deregulator Looks Back, Unswayed
necromancer <55_sux@[E  2008-11-17 16:25:40 
Re: Deregulator Looks Back, Unswayed
asclero@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-17 13:29:33 
Re: Deregulator Looks Back, Unswayed
Jigsaw1695 <Jigsaw1695  2008-11-17 21:26:11 
Re: Deregulator Looks Back, Unswayed
Donna Evleth <devleth@  2008-11-18 12:43:59 
Re: Deregulator Looks Back, Unswayed
Capitalist Pig <cochon  2008-11-18 15:20:42 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 17:42:31 PST 2009.