Re: Does Barack Hussein Obama stand for anything? Now he will "rethink"Iraqtroop

Bill Bonde { ''Direct And On Point'') wrote:
> Jeffrey Turner wrote:
>>Bill Bonde { ''Direct And On Point'') wrote:
>>>Jeffrey Turner wrote:
>>>>abelard wrote:
>>>>>On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 06:21:20 -0700 (PDT), "PJ O'Donovan"
>>>>><Xentinc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Does this guy stand for ANYTHING?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>of course he stands for something....
>>>>>getting as many brainless idiots as possible to vote for him
>>>>
>>>>And here Bush only needed five votes.
>>>
>>>It should be noted that Bush won the election in Florida at each
>>>break point and at each recount. He also got more electoral college
>>>votes than Gore. So the SC was just going with the will of the
>>>people.
>>
>>And yet a full recount would have gone to Gore. 
> 
> Based on taking certain positions what was or wasn't a valid vote.
> A full recount taking different views about what a valid vote was
> would go to Bush. Of course Gore didn't ask for such a full
> recount, in fact set it up to have a smaller recount. 

Every consistent view investigated by the newspapers for a full recount
went to Gore.

>>They were going with
>>the will of the Republican Party.
> 
> Kook Alert.

So why did they say the ruling should not be considered precedent?

--Jeff

-- 
The struggle with evil by means of violence
is the same as an attempt to stop a cloud,
in order that there may be no rain. -Leo Tolstoy